How cited: Ward v. United States · Go Syfert

Ward v. United States (1953)

green · 50 citation events across 17 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195319892026
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. Ebey, supra. “A registrant is not required to . report to the board every move that he makes.” Id. at 377 of 424 F.2d; United States v. Chudy, supra. We conclude that the record does not support the charge that “there was deliberate purpose on the part of petitioner *710 not to comply with the Selective Service Act or the regulation issued thereunder.” Ward v. United States, supra, 344 U.S. at 924, 73 S.Ct. at 494.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
The Court stated: The record does not support the charge that, during this period, there was deliberate purpose on the part of petitioner not to comply with the Selective Service Act or the regulation issued thereunder. 344 U.S. at 924, 73 S.Ct. at 494, 97 L.Ed. at 712.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. Rabb, 394 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir. 1968) (“voluntarily, with knowledge that it was prohibited by law, and with the purpose of violating the law, and not by mistake, accident or in good faith”); Graves v. United States, 252 F.2d 878, 881 (9th Cir. 1958); Candler v. United States, 146 F.2d 424, 426 (5th Cir. 1944) (“evidence is as consistent with innocence as with guilt, and fails signally to show willful intent”); see Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.…
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare also Venus v. United States, 9 Cir., 1960, 287 F.2d 304 , reversed, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961) (per curiam opinion citing Ward v. United States, 1953, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 494 , 97 L.Ed. 711 ). .
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
N.L.R.B. v. American Thread Co., 5 Cir., 198 F.2d 137 ; see also N.L.R.B. v. Nina Dye Works Co., 3 Cir., 198 F.2d 362 , and Supreme Court per curiam opinion reversing both of these decisions in reliance upon the Dant case, supra, 344 U.S. 924 . 73 S.Ct. 390 . 5 .
green United States v. Young (1974)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Mo. · signal: see also
See also, Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 494 , 97 L.Ed. 711 (1953), rev’ing 195 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1952); and see, Venus v. United States, 368 U. S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961), rev’ing 287 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1960).