How cited: Nash v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Go Syfert

Nash v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1956)

green · 49 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195719912026
Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
The actual authority for execution of the judgment is the sentence, and the commitment functions to make the judgment of the court effective."); United States v. Weir, 724 F.2d 94, 95 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam) ("the oral sentence and not the written order constitutes the actual judgment of the court...."); Johnson v. Mabry, 602 F.2d 167, 170 (8th Cir.1979) ("the oral sentence pronounced by the sentencing judge constitutes the judgment, and anything inconsistent with the ju…
"The journal entry or signed document is not the order of the court. The order of the court is the pronouncement made by the judge in open court."
Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
The actual authority for execution of the judgment is the sentence, and the commitment functions to make the judgment of the court effective."); United States v. Weir, 724 F.2d 94, 95 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam) ("the oral sentence and not the written order constitutes the actual judgment of the court____Johnson v. Mabry, 602 F.2d 167, 170 (8th Cir.1979) ("the oral sentence pronounced by the sentencing judge constitutes the judgment, and anything inconsistent with the judgme…
"The journal entry or signed document is not the order of the court. The order of the court is the pronouncement made by the judge in open court."
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Spriggs v. United States, 225 F.2d 865, 868 (9 Cir. 1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 954 , 76 S.Ct. 342 , 100 L.Ed. 830 ; Baker v. Ellis, 204 F.2d 353, 355 (5 Cir. 1953); Meredith v. Gough, 168 F.2d 193 (5 Cir. 1948), cert. denied 335 U.S. 873 , 69 S.Ct. 161 , 93 L.Ed. 417 .
Cited · C.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Arena v. United States, 226 F.2d 227, 236 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 954 , 76 S.Ct. 342 , 100 L.Ed. 830 (1956); Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1970) (law “well settled” that several specifications of falsity may be included in a single count); see also: United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124, 1155 (7th Cir.1974) (“In penury cases ... where one offense is committed, all the false declarations pertaining to that offense can be charged in o…
green State v. Downey (1969)
Cited (see also) · Ariz. · signal: see also
See also Spriggs v. United States, 225 F.2d 865 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 954 , 76 S.Ct. 342 , 100 L.Ed. 830 ; United States v. Valachi, 172 F.Supp. 113 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 242 F.2d 302 , cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 ; Cobb v. Snow, 14 Utah 2d 170 , 380 P.2d 457 ; State v. Percy, 81 S.D. 519 , 137 N.W.2d 888 ; People v. Coronado, 144 Cal. 207 , 79 P. 418 .
Cited · S.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Arena v. United States, 226 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 954 , 76 S.Ct. 342 , 100 L.Ed. 830 (1956); and United States v. Otto, 54 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1931).