Nugent v. Yellow Cab Co. (1962)

green · 103 citation events across 44 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 1 Green 14

Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

196219942026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow United States v. Johnson (1972)

But See · E.D.N.Y · signal: but cf.

But cf. United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812 , 821-822 n. 7 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).

green Cal-Am Corporation, and Counter-Defendant v. Joe Talley Spence, Joseph R. Laird, Jr., Third Party (1981)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See, Haynes v. Eagle-Picher Co., 295 F.2d 761 (10th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 846 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).

green Walter A. Read v. Local Lodge 1284, International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers, Afl--Cio (1975)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Richter v. United States, 296 F.2d 509, 510 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).

green Read v. Local Lodge 1284, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (1975)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Richter v. United States, 296 F.2d 509, 510 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).

green Harold W. Grausam, Jr. v. Henry S. Murphey, M.D., Individually and as Medical Director of Henry Landis State … (1971)

Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also

See also Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959). 10 . 296 F.2d 97, 98 (3rd Cir. 1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 793 (1962). 11 . 71 P.P.S. § 741.1 et seq. 12 .

green United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn Sayyed (1966)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

We reject out of hand the claim that the testimony was admissible for the purpose of impeaching the testimony of Wood, the chief prosecution witness, by showing acts of misconduct not the subject of a prior criminal conviction. *15 Character impeachment by proof of misconduct not the subject of convictions is not only limited to cross-examination, see United States v. Masino, 275 F.2d 129, 133 (2d Cir. 1960); McCormick, supra § 49, at 89 & n. 21, but, in this circuit, “speci…

green S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., and the Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Ben… (1965)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: accord

Accord, Zimmerman v. Montour R.R., 296 F.2d 97 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962); Weber v. McKee, 215 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1954). 12 .

green United States v. Tomison (1997)

Cited · E.D. Cal. · signal: see

See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 821 (2d Cir.) (interpreting Bowman as saying that Rule 17(c) permits pretrial production if it is necessary for the moving party to use the material as evidence at trial), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962). 14 In sum, the fact that a criminal defendant has both a right to the pre-trial production of evidence and a right to protect his trial strategy, contraindicates a noticed motion practice requiring …

green Boyer v. Davis (In Re U.S.A. Diversified Products, Inc.) (1995)

Cited (see also) · Bankr. N.D. Ind. · signal: see also

Thus, a summary turnover order could be and usually was enforced by contempt proceedings. 5A Remington on Bankruptcy, § 2457 at 264; see also, Matter of Glostex Products, Inc., 295 F.2d 324, 325 (7th Cir.1961) (whether or not an order is a turnover order is determined by the nature of the remedy contemplated), cer t. denied, Klein v. Herman, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 846 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).

green United States v. Cherry (1995)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 821 (2d Cir.1962) (“Rule 17(c) is a device solely for the obtaining of evidence for the use of the moving party, permitting him to examine the material obtained before trial only where ... it is necessary that he do so in order to make use of the material as evidence.”), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962); United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 577 (9th Cir. 1984) (court properly quashed subpoena seeking …

court properly quashed subpoena seeking production of documents which would not have been admissible “under the limitations of Federal Rules of Evidence 803(8)(B)”

green In Re Moore (1986)

Cited · Bankr. W.D. Okla. · signal: see

See Lewis v. Fitzgerald, 295 F.2d 877 (10th Cir.1961) cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).

green In Re Brown (1982)

Cited · 1st Cir. BAP · signal: see

See Zimmerman v. Montour Railroad Co., 296 F.2d 97, 98 (3d Cir. 1961) cert. denied 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 .

green Williams v. Five Platters, Inc. (1975)

Cited (see also) · C.C.P.A. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e. g., Nugent v. Yellow Cab Co., 295 F.2d 794 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 844 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).

green Commonwealth v. Simione (1972)

Cited · Pa. · signal: see

P. 221. [6] Brief for Commonwealth at 1. [7] Williams v. Commonwealth, 91 Pa. 493, 502 (1880); see United States v. Murray, 297 F. 2d 812, 819 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S. Ct. 845 (1962); IV Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure § 1865 (Anderson ed. 1957). [8] Williams v. Commonwealth, 91 Pa. 493, 502 (1880); Commonwealth v. Hershman, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 134, 139 , 90 A. 2d 314, 317 , aff'd 374 Pa. 311 , 97 A. 2d 777 (1952); see United States v. Haskins, 345…

green United States v. Rosenberg (1966)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 819-822 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).