How cited: Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc. · Go Syfert

Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc. (1965)

green · 45 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196619962026
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 911-12 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors); Modem Home Inst.
parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 (1965).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Naumkeag Theatre Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 914 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965). 6 .
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965) ; Irwin v. United States, 338 F.2d 770, 774 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1530 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
Cited · W.D. Okla. · signal: see
See Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 912 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (exclusive rights to motion picture exhibitor to show film commercially justifiable as reaching largest number of viewers with smallest number of prints and enabling first-run theatres to charge premium prices and to receive benefit of word-of-mouth advertising); Sandura Co. v. FTC, 339 F.2d 847, 852-53 (6th Cir.1964) (verti…
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
The term “scheme to defraud” as used in Section 1341 is not intended to convey any technical meaning; it simply requires a plan “reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension.” Silverman v. United States, 213 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1954); see Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965).
green Dodge v. People (1969)
Cited (see also) · Colo. · signal: see also
See also Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10th, Colo.), cert. den. 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 .