Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc. (1965)
green
· 45 citation events
across 16 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196619962026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Ethyl Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission (1984)
See, e.g., Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 911-12 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors); Modem Home Inst.
parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors
green
United States v. Adam James Jeffery (1994)
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 (1965).
green
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Company (1982)
See Naumkeag Theatre Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 914 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
green
United States v. Louis Rex Curtis (1974)
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965). 6 .
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965) ; Irwin v. United States, 338 F.2d 770, 774 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1530 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
See Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 912 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (exclusive rights to motion picture exhibitor to show film commercially justifiable as reaching largest number of viewers with smallest number of prints and enabling first-run theatres to charge premium prices and to receive benefit of word-of-mouth advertising); Sandura Co. v. FTC, 339 F.2d 847, 852-53 (6th Cir.1964) (verti…
green
United States v. Goldman (1977)
The term “scheme to defraud” as used in Section 1341 is not intended to convey any technical meaning; it simply requires a plan “reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension.” Silverman v. United States, 213 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1954); see Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965).
green
Dodge v. People (1969)
See also Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10th, Colo.), cert. den. 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 .