How cited: Superior Court of California v. First National Bank of Oakland · Go Syfert

Superior Court of California v. First National Bank of Oakland (1966)

green · 49 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196719962026
But See · 7th Cir. · signal: but see
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 217 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Sullivan, 498 F.2d 146, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974); but see Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 804 (1st Cir.) (no violation if taking done for union purpose, even if act was unauthorized), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 215 n. 4; see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 799 (1st Cir.) (“Embezzlement ... carries with it the concept of a breach of a fiduciary relationship.”), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 798-99 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Doyle v. United States, 318 F.2d 419, 420-22 (8th Cir. 1963).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
United States v. Notarantonio, 758 F.2d 777, 788 (1st Cir.1985) (court must consider all the evidence in weighing 'sufficiency' if it reserves judgment on motion for acquittal made at close of government's case until the close of all the evidence); see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); cf. United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23-24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. …
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
United States v. Notarantonio, 758 F.2d 777, 788 (1st Cir.1985) (court must consider all the evidence in weighing ‘sufficiency’ if it reserves judgment on motion for acquittal made at close of government's case until the close of all the evidence); see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); cf. United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23-24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. …
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); United States v. Keuylian, 602 F.2d 1033, 1040-41 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Trotter, 529 F.2d 806 , 809 n. 3 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Heller, 527 F.2d 1173 (4th Cir.1975); United States v. Perry, 638 F.2d 862, 870 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Black, 525 F.2d 668, 669 (6th Cir.1975); United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 858 (7th Cir.),…
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Woxberg v. United States, 329 F.2d 284 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 823 , 85 S.Ct. 45 , 13 L.Ed.2d 33 (1964).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 , 798 n.4 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966), and the legislative history there cited.
green United States v. Bane (1977)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Mich. · signal: see also
See also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966), where, at 802-3, the court stated: As to the latter motion, made at the conclusion of all the evidence, defendant asserts that there was insufficient evidence to justify a finding by the jury of criminal intent and conversion to defendant’s use.
Cited · Tenn. · signal: see
See First National Bank of Oakland v. Superior Court, 240 Cal.App.2d 109 , 49 Cal.Rptr. 358 (1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Miller v. Mercantile National Bank of Hammond, 234 Ind. 202 , 125 N.E.2d 720 (1955); Kemple v. Security First National Bank of Los Angeles, 249 Cal.App.2d 719 , 57 Cal.Rptr. 838 (1967); Freeman Mfg.