How cited: Kaufman v. New York Central Railroad · Go Syfert

Kaufman v. New York Central Railroad (1969)

green · 86 citation events across 34 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
yellow Fenton v. Freedman (1984)
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but cf.
But cf. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. Simpson, 404 F.2d 511, 514-15 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 988 , 89 S.Ct. 1470 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1968) (compulsory counterclaim can be held to give rise to federal jurisdiction where defendant counterclaimant has not objected to federal court’s assumption of jurisdiction over plaintiff’s main claim on ground that action is insufficient, and additionally files a compulsory counterclaim that exceeds $10,000) (dictum).
yellow Fenton v. Freedman (1984)
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but cf.
But cf. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. Simpson, 404 F.2d 511, 514-15 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 988 , 89 S.Ct. 1470 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1968) (compulsory counterclaim can be held to give rise to federal jurisdiction where defendant counterclaimant has not objected to federal court's assumption of jurisdiction over plaintiff's main claim on ground that action is insufficient, and additionally files a compulsory counterclaim that exceeds $10,000) (dictum).
green Cox v. Treadway (1996)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: accord
Accord Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1028 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969) (action not commenced against "John Doe" defendants named in original complaint until Does identified and served with process). 79 Finally, appellants cannot benefit from the "imputed knowledge" doctrine of Berndt v. Tennessee, 796 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.1986), because the City of Louisville was never named as a defendant in this c…
action not commenced against "John Doe" defendants named in original complaint until Does identified and served with process
green Cox v. Treadway (1996)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: accord
Accord Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1028 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969) (action not commenced against “John Doe” defendants named in original complaint until Does identified and served with process).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 654 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1028 (6th Cir. 1968) (“The original fraud is regarded as a continuing affirmative act, and mere silence of the defendant is treated as concealment.”), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969); see also Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392, 397 , 66 S.Ct. 582, 585 , 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946) (noting that where plaintiff has been diligent in pursuing fraud claim, statute is tolled even though…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Watson v. Gulf Stevedores Corp., 400 F.2d 649 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Watson v. Gulf Stevedores Corp., 400 F.2d 649 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 651 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969) (stating that the substantial evidence formula for review “is not like a standard of weights and measures”).
stating that the substantial evidence formula for review “is not like a standard of weights and measures”
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 651 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969) (stating that the substantial evidence formula for review "is not like a standard of weights and measures").
stating that the substantial evidence formula for review "is not like a standard of weights and measures"
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 653 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 653 (5th Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1028 (6th Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969); Martin v. Virgin Islands National Bank, 455 F.2d 985 (3rd Cir. 1972); Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Aluminum Company of America, 438 F.2d 1286, 1299 (5th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 1047 , 92 S.Ct. 701 , 30 L.Ed.2d 736 (1972); Scalise v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 47 F.R.D. 148 (D.Del. 1969); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice…
Cited · Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969) (permanent means that the disability is lasting or continuous as distinguished from temporary); Rose v. Thornton and Florence Electric Company, 4 Kan.App.2d 669, 609 P.2d 1180 (1980) (permanency of disability is determined by continuation for an indefinite or indeterminate period of time); Overland Construction v. Industrial Commission, 37 Ill.2d…
permanent means that the disability is lasting or continuous as distinguished from temporary
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 400 F.2d 649, 653 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1471 , 22 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969) (noting that “findings may be clearly erroneous without being unreasonable so as to be upset under the substantial-evidence rule”) (emphasis added); Bernard Schwartz, Administrative Law § 10.11, at 605 (2d ed. 1984).
Cited · E.D. Wis. · signal: see
See Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Simpson, 404 F.2d 511, 515-16 (7th Cir.1968) (district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in a diversity action where amount in controversy was exactly $10,000.00 — the then statutory amount), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 988 , 89 S.Ct. 1470 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969).
Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see
See Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023, 1028 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987 , 89 S.Ct. 1468 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969) (“[T]o toll the statute there must be affirmative acts or misrepresentations____ If, however, plaintiff’s cause of action is based on fraud, a different rule would apply.
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Simpson, 404 F.2d 511 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 988 , 89 S.Ct. 1470 , 22 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969).