How cited: Hedberg v. California · Go Syfert

Hedberg v. California (1969)

green · 39 citation events across 24 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
yellow Raisley v. Sullivan (1972)
But See · Or. Ct. App. · signal: but see
But see, Halliday v. United States, 394 US 831 , 89 S Ct 1498 , 23 L Ed 2d 16 , rehearing denied 395 US 971 , 89 S Ct 2106 , 23 L Ed 2d 761 (1969); North Carolina v. Alford, supra, 400 US at 29 n 3. ④ The court assured Shouse he could always dismiss the court-appointed attorney and told him that conflicts sometimes required another appointment. ⑤ Raisley’s prior record included grand theft auto, burglary, petty theft, escape from a penal institution. ⑥ In fact, he was 19 yea…
green State v. Bearshield (1983)
Cited (see also) · Idaho · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Halliday v. United States, 380 F.2d 270, 272 (1st Cir.1967), aff'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1970). "[T]he post-conviction act requires that the hearing be had before the same court in which the conviction took place.
green Freeman v. State (1988)
Cited (see also) · Idaho Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Halliday v. United States, 380 F.2d 270 (1st Cir.1967), aff'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 , reh’g denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969) and Davis v. State, supra; 4 see also footnote 2, supra. We do not agree with Freeman’s argument that the judge’s statements exhibited an improper predisposition which warranted disqualification.
green State v. Garcia (1979)
Cited (see also) · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also, Halliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969), reh. denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969).
green State v. Flauaus (1974)
Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969), rehearing denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969), which upheld the validity of a search warrant, based on Steele v. United States, supra, which named an entire apartment building although the intent was to search a single apartment and which contained an erroneous address.