How cited: Liben v. City of New York · Go Syfert

Liben v. City of New York (1970)

green · 119 citation events across 37 courts. Showing the 30 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197019982026
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (option holder who was assured that company would be managed in his interests was beneficial owner); Sherman Dean Fund, Inc. v. Potamkin, 77 Civ. 1549, slip op. at 4 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (option holder who was assured that company would be managed in his interests was beneficial owner); Sherman Dean Fund, Inc. v. Potamkin, 77 Civ.1549, slip op. at 4 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Perlman, 430 F.2d 22, 24 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970) (bench trial). 13 Council had been present at the March 10, 1980, meeting at which Officer Kolman and White negotiated the price for the heroin at issue here.
bench trial
green United States v. White (1981)
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Perlman, 430 F.2d 22, 24 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970) (bench trial).
bench trial
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 21 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970) (§ 1505); Cole v. United States, 329 F.2d 437 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 1630 , 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964) (§ 1503); Stein v. United States, 337 F.2d 14 (9th Cir. 1964).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See generally, Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 305 F.Supp. 310, 313-16 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 425 F.2d 348, 357-58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970). 21 .
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 21 L.Ed.2d 63 *725 (1970) (§ 1505); Cole v. United States, 329 F.2d 437 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 1630 , 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964) (§ 1503); Stein v. United States, 337 F.2d 14 (9th Cir. 1964).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., United States v. Abrams, 2 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 86 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 ; United States v. Egenberg, 2 Cir. 1971, 441 F.2d 441 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 530 , 30 L.Ed.2d 546 ; United States v. Thomas, 6 Cir. 1973, 484 F.2d 909 , cert. denied, 1974, 415 U.S. 924 , 94 S.Ct. 1428 , 39 L.Ed.2d 480 .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
For this reason, we test the instruction given against the plain error standard, see Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 30, 52(b), and conclude that even if the charge was less than happily phrased, it did not amount to plain error. 100 The second paragraph begins by stating, correctly, that the word " corruptly" in § 1503 "means a defendant acted with improper motive or with bad or evil or wicked purpose." United States v. Ryan, 455 F.2d 728, 734 (9th Cir. 1971); See United States v. Abrams, …
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
The second paragraph begins by stating, correctly, that the word “corruptly” in § 1503 “means a defendant acted with improper motive or with bad or evil or wicked purpose.” United States v. Ryan, 455 F.2d 728, 734 (9th Cir. 1971); See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86, 90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970) (construing 18 U.S.C. § 1505 ).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348, 354-356 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86 (2 Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970); United States v. Cianchetti, 315 F.2d 584, 592 (2 Cir. 1963).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86, 90-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970); United States v. Cianchetti, 315 F.2d 584, 592 (2d Cir. 1963).
Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see
See Dreyfus v. First National Bank of Chicago, 424 F.2d 1171, 1175 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348, 353 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970) (two factors bearing upon potential for speculative abuse are access to inside information and ability to influence timing of transaction).
two factors bearing upon potential for speculative abuse are access to inside information and ability to influence timing of transaction
Cited (see also) · Bankr. W.D. Tex. · signal: see also
In re Checkmate Stereo & Electronics, Ltd., 21 B.R. 402, 406 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1982); see also Bush v. Allstate Insurance Co., 425 F.2d 393 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 833 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see also
Courts occasionally confuse the concepts of "purchase" and “sale” for the purpose of determining whether a person is a "ten percent beneficial owner” with the definitions of those terms for the purposes of determining whether there has been a liability-producing short-swing "purchase and sale.” See, e.g., Colon v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 812 F.2d 357, 367 (7th Cir.1987); see also Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 , 356 n. 8 (2d Cir.1970) (properly distinguishing betwee…
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Sellers v. Time, Inc., 423 F.2d 887 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 830 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 67 (1970); Eaton, The American Law of Defamation Through Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. and Beyond: an Analytical Primer, 61 Va.L.Rev. 1349, 1355 n. 20 (1975).
Cited · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see
See Bush v. Allstate Insurance Co., 425 F.2d 393, 396 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 833 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 64 , reh’g denied, 400 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 364 , 27 L.Ed.2d 397 (1970); Walton v. Eaton Corp., 563 F.2d 66, 71 (3d Cir. 1977); Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd. v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center, 95 F.R.D. 194, 196 (E.D.Pa.1982).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 294 F.Supp. 358 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), aff’d, 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); Roth v. Fund of Funds, Ltd., 405 F.2d 421 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 975 , 89 S.Ct. 1469 , 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969); Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Volk v. Zlotoff, 285 F.Supp. 650 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Bush v. Allstate Insurance Co., 425 F.2d 393, 396 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 833 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970); Roth v. Hyer, supra. Under the criteria of Mesa Petroleum Co. v. Coniglio, 629 F.2d 1022, 1029 (5th Cir.1980), the Court declines to order a jury trial.
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348, 351 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348, 353-54 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970) (“The significant factor is whether RKO could have reaped speculative profit from the ‘unfair use of information * * * obtained * * by reason of [its] relationship to [Central].’ Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 16(b)” (emphasis in original); defendant corporation’s purchase of another corporation’s shares, in anticipation of the issuer’…
“The significant factor is whether RKO could have reaped speculative profit from the ‘unfair use of information * * * obtained * * by reason of [its] relationship to [Central].’ Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 16(b)” (emphasis in original
Cited · E.D. Tenn. · signal: accord
Rule 39.02, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. “ * * * [T]his discretionary right must be read into the language of Rule 81(c); it comports also with Rule 39(b). * * * ” Higgins v. Boeing Co., supra, 526 F.2d at 1007 [4]. 2 “ * * * Where Rules 38(b) and 81(c) have not been complied with, the District Court, in its exercise of its discretion, may, of course, relieve against the waiver. * * * ” 5 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed.) 327, ¶ 38.39 [3]; accord Bush v. Allstate Insu…
Cited · Minn. · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86, 90 (2d Cir.) (application to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) for voluntary departure is “proceeding” under statute prohibiting the influencing of a witness before the INS), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970); Cardinali v. Planning Board, 373 A.2d 251, 253 (Me.1977) (application for subdivision approval is a “proceeding” under a general savings clause). 3 .
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); Lewis v. *1147 Realty Equities Corp., 373 F.Supp. 829, 831 (S.D.N.Y.1974) (Lewis I); but see Colby v. Klune, 178 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1949).
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86, 91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970); 8 C.F.R. § 264.1 (1975); 2 Gordon and Rosenfield, IMMIGRATION LAW AND PROCEDURE § 6.10d at 6-79 (Rev. ed. 1975). 1 En route to the INS headquarters Castro admitted to the investigators that he was in this country illegally and was subject to deportation.
green Lewis v. Wells (1971)
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also Newmark v. RKO General Inc., 425 F.2d 348, 356 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); Blau v. Lamb, 363 F.2d 507, 515-516 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1002 , 87 S.Ct. 707 , 17 L.Ed.2d 542 (1967). 6 .
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
Stella v. Graham Paige Motors Corp., 232 F.2d 290, 300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 352 U.S. 831 , 77 S.Ct. 46 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); see Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); Kahansky v. Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corp., 184 F.Supp. 90, 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1960). 4.