Foster v. Mancusi (1972)

green · 114 citation events across 32 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 1 Green 17

Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197219992026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman (1979)

But See · 3rd Cir. · signal: but see

But see United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274, 288 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972) (“As to the awesome-office theory, we do not agree that the mere fact that a witness holds an office of public trust should disqualify him as a witness [where he does not otherwise participate in the trial] . ”); United States v. Callanan, 450 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1970) (same).

“As to the awesome-office theory, we do not agree that the mere fact that a witness holds an office of public trust should disqualify him as a witness [where he does not otherwise participate in the trial] . ”

green Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Leroy Jackson (1988)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Declaratory relief has been generally regarded as to be as objectionable in this context as injunctive relief.”); Thiokol Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 448 F.2d 1328, 1332 (3d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1019 , 92 S.Ct. 684 , 30 L.Ed.2d 668 (1972) 20 ; Chandler v. O’Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1058 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972) (“[Wjhere an injunction is improper under § 2283, declaratory relief should no…

“[Wjhere an injunction is improper under § 2283, declaratory relief should not be given. Samuels v. Mackell ....”

green United States v. Albert Puco (1973)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e. g., United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274, 283 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); United States v. Clayton, supra, 450 F.2d at 19-20 ; United States v. Adams, supra; United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327, 335-40 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 1524 , 28 L.Ed.2d 867 (1971); cf. Childs v. Cardwell, 452 F.2d 541 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 912 (1972); United States v. Glasser, 443 F.2d 99…

green Bobroff v. Continental Bank (1985)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Chandler v. O’Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1058 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972).

green In Re Bobroff (1985)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Chandler v. O'Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1058 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972). 13 Thus, the state court would be free to proceed and actually litigate the dispute on the merits.

green United States v. Frank G. Prantil (1985)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274, 288 (7th Cir.1971) (prosecutor not disqualified as a witness under the “awesome office” theory so long as prosecutor does not otherwise participate in trial), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1169 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972).

green United States v. Frank G. Prantil (1985)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

green United States v. Cleveland R. Rodgers (1985)

Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see also

See also United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274, 286 (7th Cir.1971) (discussing relevance of purpose of speech to whether that speech is protected), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972).

green United States v. Phillip Bertman (1982)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972). 3 .

green United States v. Baker (1978)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also

See also Sumida v. Yumen, 409 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. den., 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 , reh. den., 405 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 1308 , 31 L.Ed.2d 591 (1972); Aune v. Reynders, 344 F.2d 835 (10th Cir. 1965); Ideal Toy Corp. v. Sayco Doll Corp., 302 F.2d 623 (2d Cir. 1962); District 65, Distributive, Processing and Office Workers Union v. McKague, 216 F.2d 153 (3d Cir. 1954); Miller v. United States, 114 F.2d 267 (7th Cir. 1940).

green 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 622, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8310 Nora Lewis, Elizabeth Bullock, Mary Carter, Betty John… (1978)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also

green Garrett v. Hoffman (1977)

Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Chandler v. O’Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1058 (10th Cir. 1971) (semble), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972); Goss v. Illinois, 312 F.2d 257 (7th Cir. 1963) (alternative holding); Nongard v. Burlington County Bridge Comm’n, 229 F.2d 622 , 625 (3d Cir. 1956); Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. v. Lauer, 268 F.2d 187 (5th Cir.) (by implication), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 913 , 80 S.Ct. 258 , 4 L.Ed.2d 184 (1959); Joachim Memorial Home v. Askew, 404 …

alternative holding

green State v. Johnson (1985)

Cited · Mo. · signal: see

See United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); United States v. Hubbard, 493 F.Supp. at 208 ; Ford v. State, 628 S.W.2d at 343 ; People ex rel.

green State v. Clausell (1985)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1169 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); People ex rel.

green United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co. (1982)

Cited (see also) · N.M. · signal: see also

See Napper v. Anderson, Henley, Shields, Bradford & P., 500 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837 , 96 S.Ct. 65 , 46 L.Ed.2d 56 (1975); see also Chandler v. O’Bryan, 445 F.2d 1045, 1057 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1176 , 31 L.Ed.2d 241 (1972) (when district judge considered all questions raised on his hearing of removal of state libel suit and determined that case should be remanded for state court trial, that decision was res judic…

when district judge considered all questions raised on his hearing of removal of state libel suit and determined that case should be remanded for state court trial, that decision was res judicata on issue of forum

green Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc. (1981)

Cited (see also) · Ariz. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e. g., United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); United States v. Vereen, 429 F.2d 713 (D.C.Cir.1970); State v. Caldwell, 117 Ariz. 464 , 573 P.2d 864 (1977). 5 .

green State v. Vaughan (1979)

Cited · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see

See United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. den. 405 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972).

green People v. Lopez (1977)

Cited (see also) · Cal. Ct. App. · signal: see also

In People v. Munoz (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 87 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 451 ], the court stated: “However, while the reasons given by the superintendent for the exclusion fall within the scope of relevancy set forth in section 3053, the question of whether there was a factual basis for the superintendent’s determination that the defendant had engaged in excessive trafficking and had failed to respond to previous programs remains for consideration.” (Id, at pp. 92-93; see also People v. H…