How cited: Daniel v. United States · Go Syfert

Daniel v. United States (1972)

green · 169 citation events across 42 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197219992026
Quote Authority · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also
See also Direct Mail Advertising Ass'n v. USPS, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 394 , 395, 458 F.2d 813, 814 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 43 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972) ("one of (the Act's) principal goals was that eventually the Postal Service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.") 82 39 U.S.C. § 3621 (emphasis added) 83 Brief for Appellee at 48 (citing NLRB v. Hear…
"one of (the Act's) principal goals was that eventually the Postal Service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations."
Quote Authority · D.C. Cir. · signal: see also
See also Direct Mail Advertising Ass’n v. USPS, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 394 , 395, 458 F.2d 813, 814 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 43 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972) (“one of [the Act’s] principal goals was that eventually the Postal Service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.”). . 39 U.S.C. § 3621 (emphasis added). .
“one of [the Act’s] principal goals was that eventually the Postal Service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.”
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 6 citations in this opinion
More recently, the Commission stated that the broadcaster "is not required to research everything it has broadcast on the subject over a considerable period of time, unless it believes it is necessary to do so in order to establish its compliance with the fairness doctrine with respect to the issue involved." Fairness Report, 48 F.C.C.2d at 20; See generally Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 399-400 , 460 F.2d 891 , 907-08, Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 326 F.Supp. 1335, 1352-3 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d, 456 F.2d 979, 982 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 , reh. den. 409 U.S. 1049 , 93 S.Ct. 509 , 34 L.Ed.2d 502 (1972); Balter v. Bato Company, Inc., 385 F.Supp. 420 (W.D.Pa.1974).
green U.S. v. Robinson (1992)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607-08 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 3 Robinson cites several cases from various tax contexts that hold that an unsigned Form 1040 is not a "return." Because the filing of a "return" is not an element of the crime, we need not address that issue. 5 (1972).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607-08 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Borum v. United States, 409 F.2d 433, 440 (D.C.Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 608 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 824 (5th Cir.1980).
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see also
Cir.1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969); United States v. Chiarella, 214 F.2d 838, 841 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 902 , 75 S.Ct. 226 , 99 L.Ed. 708 (1954); see also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 983-84 (5th Cir.1968), appeal after remand, 453 F.2d 605 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972) (reversing conviction and remanding for new trial where trial court’s repeated interjections were “definitely prejudicial”).
reversing conviction and remanding for new trial where trial court’s repeated interjections were “definitely prejudicial”
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 460 F.2d 891 , 901-02 (D.C.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972) (personal attack rule is a corollary of fairness doctrine); United States v. WIYN Radio, Inc., 464 F.Supp. 101 (N.D.Ga.1978); Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Personal Attack/Political Editorials, 31 Fed.Reg. 5710 (1966).
personal attack rule is a corollary of fairness doctrine
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607 (5th Cir. 1971) (dictum), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Bursten v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 976 , cert. denied 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 .
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 396-397 , 460 F.2d 891, 904-905 (Tamm, J.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Green v. FCC, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 353, 358 , 447 F.2d 323 , 328 (1971) (Wilkey, J.).
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 396-397 , 460 F.2d 891 , 904-905 (Tamm, J.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Green v. FCC, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 353, 358, 447 F.2d 323 , 328 (1971) (Wilkey, J.).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358 , 367 n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). .
green Thompson v. Washington (1973)
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Adams v. Egley, 338 F.Supp. 614 (S.D.Cal., 1972) (California Commercial Code Section 9-503, 9-504 invalidated) with Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Financing Corporation, 456 F.2d 979 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972). .
Cited · D.P.R. · signal: see
See United States v. Brown, 457 F.2d 731, 733 (1st Cir.) (noting, in assessing whether probable cause existed, that defendant "appeared nervous”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972). 30 .
green Heller v. Plave (1990)
Cited (see also) · S.D. Fla. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981-982 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). 4 .
green State v. Brown (1986)
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 457 F.2d 731 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S. Ct. 42 , 34 L.
green People v. Smith (1984)
Cited · Cal. Ct. App. · signal: see
The evidence supports the jury's implicit conclusion defendant benefited and had income by receiving *1172 stock, and whether he personally benefited from his use of that stock is not the issue. [43] (64a) Was the Defense of Reliance Established as a Matter of Law? (65a) "It is a valid defense to a charge of filing a false return if a defendant provides full information regarding his taxable income and expenses to an accountant qualified to prepare... tax returns, and that t…
green Williams v. State (1981)
Cited · Alaska · signal: accord
Accord, United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 610-11 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 , 321 & n.6 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969). .
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358, 364-65 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); McCormick on Evidence § 295, at 696 (2d ed. 1972). 3 .
green State v. Thompson (1977)
Cited (see also) · Me. · signal: see also
See also United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F. 2d 358, 370 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 112 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Ryan v. United States, 314 F.2d 306, 310 (10th Cir. 1963).
Cited (see also) · C.D. Cal. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 460 F.2d 891 , 911, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Hansen v. FCC, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 413 F.2d 374, 376 (1969); cf. Unemployment Compensa *1077 tion Commission v. Aragan, 329 U.S. 143, 155 , 67 S.Ct. 245 , 91 L.Ed. 136 (1946).
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See, Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance Corporation, 326 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d 456 F.2d 979 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also, Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 456 F.2d 979, 981 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Gregg, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 1021 .
green Roscoe v. Butler (1973)
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 456 F.2d 979, 982 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972) (use of long-arm statute to secure jurisdiction over non-resident debtor not viable alternative to summary attachment because the former could result in extended litigation on whether sufficient minimum contacts existed to justify use of long-arm statute).
use of long-arm statute to secure jurisdiction over non-resident debtor not viable alternative to summary attachment because the former could result in extended litigation on whether sufficient minimum contacts existed to justify use of long-arm statute