How cited: Freeman v. United States · Go Syfert

Freeman v. United States (1974)

green · 118 citation events across 44 courts. Showing the 22 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197420002026
Quote Authority · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 367 , 502 F.2d 362, 369 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974) (“it is generally agreed that exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action”). 61 .
“it is generally agreed that exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action”
Quote Authority · D.N.M.
See also Olivares v. Martin, 555 F.2d 1192 , *1304 1196-1197 (5th Cir.1977) (“at least one of the purported representatives of a class must have exhausted his administrative remedies”); Williams v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 552 F.2d 691, 697 (6th Cir.1977) (“there is no requirement that each member of the potential class demonstrate exhaustion of administrative remedies”); Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 369 (D.C.Cir.1974) cer t. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42
“exhaustion by at least one member of the class is a necessary prerequisite for a class action”
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 366-67 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974) (affirming district court’s denial of class certification because there was some likelihood of conflicts among class representatives).
affirming district court’s denial of class certification because there was some likelihood of conflicts among class representatives
Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see also
See United States v. Soteras, 770 F.2d 641, 646 (7th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Reicin, 497 F.2d 563, 569 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 369 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974); League of United Latin American Citizens v. Hampton, 501 F.2d 843 , 847 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1974); Marrone v. INS, 500 F.2d 418 , 420 (2d Cir.1974) (per curiam).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See King's Garden, Inc. v. FCC, 498 F.2d 51, 56 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See King’s Garden, Inc. v. FCC, 498 F.2d 51, 56 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362 , 369, cert, denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
exhaustion of remedies requirement satisfied for class action if named plaintiff representing class exhausted remedies
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Reicin, 497 F.2d 563 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 ; United States v. Kubitsky, 469 F.2d 1253 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 1536 , 36 L.Ed.2d 198 . 3 .
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Wiles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 499 F.2d 255, 257 , cert. denied 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 , and Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 442 F.2d 1149, 1151 .
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Bibler v. Young, 492 F2d 1351 (6th Cir), cert den 419 US 996 (1974).
Cited (see also) · Cal. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
(See Columbus Janitor Service (1971) 191 N.L.R.B. 902 , 910-911; see also Rushton & Mercier Woodworking Co. (1973) 203 N.L.R.B. 123 , 125-126, enforced (1st Cir. 1974) 502 F.2d 1160 , cert. den., 419 U.S. 996 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 270 , 95 S.Ct. 310 ].) Great Dane aside, common sense supports the Board’s argument that it could infer bad motive from the lack of credibility in Harris’ explanations.
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 366 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974) (class action inappropriate when interests of named plaintiff are antagonistic to class members) (cited with approval in Hagans v. Wyman, 527 F.2d 1151, 1154 (2d Cir.1975)).
class action inappropriate when interests of named plaintiff are antagonistic to class members
green Fielder v. State (1985)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Yates v. State, 509 S.W.2d 600 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Baker v. State, 368 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Crim.App.1963); and Washburn v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 125 , 318 S.W.2d 627 (1958).
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362, 369 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · D. Mass. · signal: see
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 485 F.Supp. 255, 260 (N.D.Tex. 1980); see King’s Garden, Inc. v. F.C.C., 498 F.2d 51, 55-57 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
green Rodgers v. Atencio (1979)
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 502 F.2d 362 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 364 , 502 F.2d 362 , 366 cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 367 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974); Davis v. Weir, 497 F.2d 139, 147 (5th Cir. 1974).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Cal. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 366-367 (1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (retired post office employees contesting premature retirement on grounds of coercion had interests which conflicted with those retired employees who were happy with early retirement); Schy v. Susquehanna Corp., 419 F.2d 1112, 1117 (7th Cir. 1970) cert. den. 400 U.S. 826 , 91 S.Ct. 51 , 27 L.Ed.2d 55 (shareholders opposing a merger ver…
green Seiden v. Nicholson (1976)
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362, 366 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1974).
green Schnorbach v. Fuqua (1975)
Cited · S.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Section E, infra. A remedies conflict from outside the securities area is found in Phillips v. Klassen, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 502 F.2d 362 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 996 , 95 S.Ct. 309 , 42 L.Ed.2d 269 (1975).