How cited: Chambers v. Missouri · Go Syfert

Chambers v. Missouri (1976)

green · 81 citation events across 30 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197620012026
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 212 (2d Cir.1975) (holding that "smell alone may justify issuance of a warrant if the affiant is qualified to know the odor and the odor is distinctive.") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). 23 We hold that a warrant cannot be based on the claim of an untrained or inexperienced person to have smelled growing plants which have no commonly recognized odor.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
“Obviously, however, those rights cannot be both exercised at the same time.” United States v. Mitchell, 137 F.2d 1006, 1010 , aff’d on rehearing, 138 F.2d 831 (2d Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 794 , 64 S.Ct. 785 , 88 L.Ed. 1083 (1944); see United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457 , 462-63 & n. 2 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). 4 A defendant who elects to be represented by counsel surrenders the right to make the ultimat…
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687, 691 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687, 690 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); United States v. Joyce, 499 F.2d 9, 18 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1031 , 95 S.Ct. 512 , 42 L.Ed.2d 306 (1974); United States v. Ellicott, 336 F.2d 868 , 870-71 (4th Cir.1964); United States v. Browne, 225 F.2d 751, 756 (7th Cir.1955); United States v. Baker, 50 F.2d 122, 123-24 (2d Cir. 1931).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: accord
The court concluded that “Regardless of the possibility of delivery by hand, the fact is that instruments essential to the consummation of the fraud, the false claims and misrepresentations relied upon by the insurance companies, were mailed, and the defendant could reasonably have foreseen that the mails would be used.” Id.; accord, United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687 (6 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976) (the court ruled that it…
the court ruled that it was immaterial that mailed checks could have been hand delivered or otherwise forwarded
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
The court declines to consider the Mr. Rivera’s pro se brief, because Mr. Rivera . has presented no "compelling reason” for the court to permit this so-called "hybrid representation.” United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1141 (2d Cir. 1989); see also United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976) (finding that defendant "had an experienced counsel and, so long as he retained him, he could not …
finding that defendant "had an experienced counsel and, so long as he retained him, he could not appear pro se"
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
See United States v. Doe, 405 F.2d at 438-39 (refusal to provide handwriting exemplars is admissible); see also United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.1975) (effort to disguise handwriting is admissible), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345, 348 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 , 88 S.Ct. 469 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967).
green United States v. Blohm (1984)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000, 1009 (9th Cir.1981).
green Whalen v. State (1981)
Cited · Del. · signal: see
See State v. Chambers, Mo.Supr., 524 S.W.2d 826 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976), overruled on federal constitutional grounds, State v. Morgan, supra, 592 S.W.2d at 801. 14 .
green United States v. Lace (1980)
Cited · D. Vt. · signal: see
See United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 214 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058, 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).