How cited: United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. · Go Syfert

United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. (1976)

green · 73 citation events across 22 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197620012026
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and Joiners, 528 F.2d 1304, 1310 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. NLRB, 530 F.2d 266 , 270 n. 6 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 834 , 97 S.Ct. 100 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. NLRB, 530 F.2d 266 , 270 n. 6 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 834 , 97 S.Ct. 100 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976). 3 .
Cited (see also) · D. Minnesota · signal: see also
See du Pont, 353 U.S. at 607 ; SCFC ILC, 801 F.Supp. at 525 ; see also International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 532 F.2d 231 (2d Cir.1976) (recognizing a use of stock to impose section 7 damage liability), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976) SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 463 F.Supp. 983 (D.Conn.1978) (analyzing “holding” theory and determining that an impermissible use must be involved), affirmed and remanded on other grounds,…
Cited (see also) · S.D. Fla. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 532 F.2d 231, 239-40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976) (defendant’s refusal to deal lawful because it “had no reasonable business alternative but to abandon an unprofitable and uncomfortable operation.”); Gamco, Inc. v. Providence Fruit & Produce Building, Inc., 194 F.2d 484 , 487-88 & n. 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 817 , 73 S.Ct. 11 , 97- L.Ed. 636 …
defendant’s refusal to deal lawful because it “had no reasonable business alternative but to abandon an unprofitable and uncomfortable operation.”
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See, Blanchard v. Johnson, 532 F.2d 1074 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 834 , 869, 97 S.Ct. 100 , 180, 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
Id. at 339 , 91 S.Ct. at 806 ; see International Railway of Central America v. United Brands Co., 532 F.2d 231, 247 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 532 F.2d 231, 240 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
expressing skepticism toward the doctrine of intra-enterprise conspiracy
green Pawlak v. Greenawalt (1979)
Cited (see also) · M.D. Penn. · signal: see also
See also Blanchard v. Johnson, 388 F.Supp. 208 (N.D.Ohio 1975), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 532 F.2d 1074 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 834 , 97 S.Ct. 100 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 532 F.2d 231, 240 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 101 , 50 L.Ed.2d 100 (1976).
Cited (see also) · Cal. Ct. App. · signal: see also
(See, e.g„ Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo (1974) 12 Cal.3d 608, 616 [ 116 Cal.Rptr. 507 , 526 P.2d 971 ]; Social Workers’ Union, Local 535 v. Alameda County Welfare Dept. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 382, 391 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 461 , 521 *459 P.2d 453]; see also Lipow v. Regents of University of California (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 215, 225 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 515 ].) 2 A recent third circuit case, United Steelworkers of Am., AFL-CIO-CLC v. N.L.R.B. (3d Cir. 1976) 530 F.2d 266, 280-281 (cer…