Shoemaker v. United States (1976)

green · 101 citation events across 33 courts. Showing the 26 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 26

Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197720012026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc. (1980)

Rule Authority · D. Del.

See also Roamvell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 617 (1976) (denial of certiorari) (White, J., dissenting): to be patentable, a combination of elements must produce something more than the sum of the pre-existing elements; there must be a synergistic result that is itself nonobvious. 429 U.S. at 1006, 97 S.Ct. at 539. 19 .

green Brennan v. Mr. Hanger, Inc. (1980)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., supra, 429 U.S. at 1008, 97 S.Ct. at 541, [192 U.S.P.Q. at 66] (White, J., joined by Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), quoting Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co., 321 U.S. 275, 279 , 64 S.Ct. 593 , 88 L.Ed. 721 [ 60 U.S.P.Q. 386, 388 ] (1944).

green William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp. (1988)

Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Davis v. Davis, 526 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir.1976); see also Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 (9th Cir), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green United States v. Jerry Wainright (2003)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 746 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 (1976).

green United States v. Jerry Wade Wainright (2003)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 746 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green United States v. Demareo Lamont Davis, United States of America v. Dwayne Buford Reed (1994)

Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976) (holding that admission of graphic photographs of murder victim was not abuse of discretion under Rule 403).

holding that admission of graphic photographs of murder victim was not abuse of discretion under Rule 403

green United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Randolph Short, and Cross-Appellee (1991)

Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also

See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green United States v. Maribel Laboy, A/K/A Jennifer Morales, Mary Torres (1990)

Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman (1986)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Shivers v. Amerco, 670 F.2d 826, 830 (9th Cir.1982) (citing Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); and O’Brien v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co., 593 F.2d 54, 58 (7th Cir.1979)).

green Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (1986)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See e.g., Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Shamrock Associates v. Moraga Corp., 557 F.Supp. 198, 204 (D.Del.1983); see also Brown, 661 F.2d at 65 (discussing Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977)).

green Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (1986)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

green In Re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977, for Premises at 2125 S Street, Northwest, Washington, D. C. Appeal o… (1981)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare

Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (courts characterizing as "inadvertent" the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be "inadvertent" if, be…

courts characterizing as "inadvertent" the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so

green United States v. Gary E. Hansen, Daniel E. Means, AKA Daniel E. Johnson, and Stephen R. Bryant (1981)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 527 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 .

green In re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977 (1981)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare

Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (courts characterizing as “inadvertent” the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be “inadvertent” if, be…

courts characterizing as “inadvertent” the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so

green United States v. Heldt (1981)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare

Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (both courts characterize as “inadvertent” discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be “inadvertent” if, bef…

both courts characterize as “inadvertent” discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so

green United States v. Henning Heldt and Duke Snider, United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard, United States o… (1981)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare

Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (both courts characterize as "inadvertent" discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be "inadvertent" if, bef…

both courts characterize as "inadvertent" discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so

green United States v. Lewis Shuckahosee (1980)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 527 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Hoog, 504 F.2d 45, 50 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1349 , 43 L.Ed.2d 437 (1975); United States v. Cartano, 420 F.2d 362, 364 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1054 , 90 S.Ct. 1398 , 25 L.Ed.2d 671 (1970).

green United States v. Rufus Gaines (1977)

Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e. g., United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Edwards, 539 F.2d 689, 691 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 984 , 97 S.Ct. 501 , 50 L.Ed.2d 594 ; United States v. Bear Killer, 534 F.2d 1253, 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 129 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 ; United States v. Crocker, 510 F.2d 1129, 1138 (10th Cir. 1975); United States v. M…

green United States v. Headdress (1996)

Cited (see also) · D. Utah · signal: see also

See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green United States v. Duncan (1994)

Cited (see also) · D. Utah · signal: see also

See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green United States v. Copeland (1993)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

See generally Perez ; see also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Rubio, 709 F.2d 146 (2d Cir.1983).

green United States v. Copeland (1993)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

green In Re Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation (1991)

Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see

See Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 , 854 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).

green Armco Inc. v. Glenfed Financial Corp. (1989)

Cited · D.N.J. · signal: accord

Jacobs v. Freeman, 104 Cal.App.3d 177, 188 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 680, 686 (Cal.Ct.App.1980); accord Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Re Community Medical Center, 623 F.2d 864, 866 (3d Cir.1980), citing Tessmar v. Grosner, 23 N.J. 193 , 128 A.2d 467 (1957). 17 .

green Burndy Corp. v. Kearney-National, Inc. (1979)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: accord

Accord, Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., 429 U.S. 1004, 1009 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 617 (1976) (White, J., joined by Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of writ of certiorari); Dann v. Johnston, supra, 425 U.S. at 230 n. 4, 96 S.Ct. at 1393; Anderson’s-Black Rock, supra, 396 U.S. at 61 , 90 S.Ct. at 305 ; Digitronics Corp. v. New York Racing Association, Inc., 553 F.2d 740, 748 (2d Cir.) (“Only in a close case, in which application of the subjective criterion of non…

White, J., joined by Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of writ of certiorari

green Schimizzi v. Chrysler Corp. (1978)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

See also the dissenting opinion of Justice White in Plantronics, Inc. v. Roanwell Corp., supra, 429 U.S. at 1008-09, 97 S.Ct. 538 .