How cited: City of Hartford v. Town of Glastonbury · Go Syfert

City of Hartford v. Town of Glastonbury (1978)

green · 392 citation events across 76 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
But See · D. Minnesota · signal: but see
But see Tiger Trash v. Browning Ferris Industries, Inc., 560 F.2d 818, 826 (7th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (appearing to shift at least the burden of persuasion noting that plaintiff has adequately charged and defendants have not persuaded as (sic) that a significant or appreciable segment of interstate commerce was not involved ....”) .
appearing to shift at least the burden of persuasion noting that plaintiff has adequately charged and defendants have not persuaded as (sic) that a significant or appreciable segment of interstate commerce was not involved ....”
Quote Authority · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Eaton v. Courtaulds of North America, Inc., 578 F.2d 87, 90 (5th Cir.1978). 70 The conciliation agreement provides that "Bristol Steel Company will provide 'front pay' to compensate the affected class of applicants for economic losses that they will continue to suffer between the date of execution of the Conciliation Agreement and the date they (individually) attain their rightful place." "Economic losses" are defined to include "all monetary compensation including incen…
"In 'front pay' relief, a monetary award is calculated to terminate on the date a victim of discrimination attains an opportunity to move to his 'rightful place' rather than on the date the order granting relief is entered"
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
The conciliation agreement provides that “Bristol Steel Company will provide ‘front pay’ to compensate the affected class of applicants for economic losses that they will continue to suffer between the date of execution of the Conciliation Agreement and the date they (individually) attain their rightful place.” “Economic losses” are defined to include “all monetary compensation including incentive pay, bonuses, pensions, fringe benefits, and interest.” “Rightful place” is de…
“In ‘front pay’ relief, a monetary award is calculated to terminate on the date a victim of discrimination attains an opportunity to move to his ‘rightful place’ rather than on the date the order granting relief is entered”
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings, 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings, 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally James v. Stockholm Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n.1 (5th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978). .
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); Flint v. Mullen, 499 F.2d 100,105 (1st Cir.) (“The Constitution, however, does not require the state, in every case, to adopt what appear to be preferable procedures.”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1026 , 95 S.Ct. 505 , 42 L.Ed.2d 301 (1974); see also United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. at 758-59 , 103 S.Ct. at 1553 (“ ‘That the defendant faces such a dil…
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Edynak v. Atlantic Shipping, Inc., 562 F.2d 215 (3d Cir.1977) (worker signalling crane on vessel was injured due to negligent operation of crane), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 319, 339-40 (5th Cir.1977) (employer could be held liable for test developed by consultant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 319, 339-40 (5th Cir.1977) (employer could be held liable for test developed by consultant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , *383 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); EEOC v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters, 542 F.2d 579, 590-91 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied sub nom Rio v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters, 430 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 1186 , 51 L.Ed.2d 588 (1977).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n. 1 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); 9 Keystone Plastics, Inc. v. C & P Plastics, Inc., 506 F.2d at 962 ; 10 Louis Dreyfus & Cie. v. Panama Canal Co., 298 F.2d at 737 . 11 In addition, *276 the ex parte communications occasioned by this practice create an obvious potential for abuse.
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fitting Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n. 1 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fitting Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n. 1 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, eg., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir.1972).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir.1972).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n. 1 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 314 n. 1 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 354-59 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 359 n.63 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978). 5 See, e.g., Smallwood v. National Can Co., 583 F.2d 419, 421 (9th Cir. 1978); James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358-59 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Louisville Black Police Officers Organization, Inc. v. City of Louisville, 511 F.Supp. 825, 841 (…
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 359 n.63 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978). .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 330 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348, 354-55 (5th Cir. 1972). 3 9 That the burden upon the defendant in rebutting a prima facie case should vary in the two branches of Title VII law is understood by looking to the nature of the prima facie case and the plaintiff's ultimate burden.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 330 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348, 354-55 (5th Cir. 1972). 3 That the burden upon the defendant in rebutting a prima facie ease should vary in the two branches of Title VII law is understood by looking to the nature of the prima facie case and the plaintiff’s ultimate burden.
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 , 333 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S. Ct. 767 , 54 L.
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
See Bennett v. Riggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited (see also) · M.D. Fla. · signal: see also
Joe’s Stone Crab, 15 F.Supp.2d at 1380 ; see also James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir.1977)(holding that front pay should be limited to the date a victim of discrimination attains an opportunity to move to his or her “rightful place”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 *1318 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Bennett v. Kiggins 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also
See Carter v. Sedgwick County, Kan., 36 F.3d 952 , 958 (10th Cir.1994) (in Title VII case, purpose of front-pay award is to make the victim of discrimination whole); see also James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978) (Title VII case); Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters Local No. 638 of U.A., 542 F.2d 579 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. …
Title VII case
green Esteves v. Esteves (1996)
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
See Hercules & Co., Ltd. v. Shama Restaurant Corp., 613 A.2d 916, 923 (D.C.1992) (citing Bennett v. Kiggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978)).
Cited (see also) · D.C. · signal: see also
See Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., 492 A.2d 580, 587 (D.C.1985); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652A (1977) (setting out elements of invasion of privacy (false light)); see also Bennett v. Kiggins, 377 A.2d 57, 59-60 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (same: fraud).
same: fraud
Cited · D. Mass. · signal: accord
DISCUSSION “It is not inherently unconstitutional ... to proceed with parallel civil and criminal proceedings.” Mainelli v. United States, 611 F.Supp. 606, 615 (D.C.R.I.1985) (citing United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 763 , 25 L.Ed.2d 1 (1970) 6 ); accord Arthurs v. Stem, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited (see also) · E.D. Pa. · signal: see also
See also James v. Stockham Valves & Fitting Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters, Local 638, 542 F.2d 579 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 1186 , 51 L.Ed.2d 588 (1977); Patterson v. American Tobacco Co., 535 F.2d 257, 269 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920 , 97 S.Ct. 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976). 2 .
green State v. Horton (1989)
Cited · Me. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 478-79 (1st Cir.1977) (there is nothing “inherently repugnant to due process in requiring the doctor to choose between giving testimony at the disciplinary hearing, a course that may help the criminal prosecutors, and keeping silent, a course that may lead to the loss of his license”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: accord
See Cypress v. Newport News General and Nonsectarian Hospital Ass’n, 375 F.2d 648, 658 (4th Cir.1967) (In racial discrimination suit against a hospital, the Fourth Circuit noted that " 'protestations of repentance and reform timed to anticipate or to blunt the force of a lawsuit offer insufficient assurance’ that the practice sought to be enjoined will not be repeated.”) [quoting Lankford v. Gelston, 364 F.2d 197, 203 (4th Cir.1966) ]; accord James v. Stockham Valves & Fitti…
Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 479-80 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F. 2d 477, 479 (1st Cir.1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited · M.D. Penn. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See James v. Stockholm Valves, 559 F.2d [310], 332 [(5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978)]; Mecklenberg v. Montana Board of Regents, 13 Employ.Prac.Dec. [P 11, 438] 6496 [ (D.Mont.1976) ]; cf. Presseisen v. Swarthmore College, 442 F.Supp. [593,] 619 [E.D.Pa.1977, aff’d mem., 582 F.2d 1275 (3rd Cir.1978)] (requiring regression analysis to include rank level in view of proof that assignment to rank is not discriminatory); see also F…
green Prewitt v. State (1984)
Cited (see also) · Ala. Crim. App. · signal: see also
Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence §§ 69.01 (6)-(8) (3d ed. 1977); see also discussions in, Bynum v. State , 348 So.2d 804 (Ala.Crim.App. 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 828 (Ala. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 766 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Allen v. State , 380 So.2d 313 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied, 380 So.2d 341 (Ala.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 842 , 101 S.Ct. 121 , 66 L.Ed.2d 49 (1980); and Brewer v. State , 440 So.2d 1155 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied (A…
Cited (see also) · N.D. Cal. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 358-59 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Nicodemus v. Chrysler Corp. —Toledo Machining Plant, 445 F.Supp. 559 (N.D.Ohio 1977).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Meckleberg v. Montana Board of Regents of Higher Education, 13 Employ.
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
Jacobs v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 382 A.2d 282 , 286 & n.4 (1978); Rosenberg v. Howle, D.C.Mun.App., 56 A.2d 709, 710 (1948); see Bennett v. Kiggins, D.C.App., 377 A.2d 57, 59 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978); W.
listing a fifth element, damages resulting from the action taken in reliance on the representation
green Segar v. Civiletti (1981)
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 345-47 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978). 13.
Cited · N.D. Miss. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310 (5 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).
Cited · Mass. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 478-480 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 (1978).
green Thompson v. Boyle (1980)
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 328-9 (5th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 767 , 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 494 F.2d 211, 225-34 (5th Cir. 1974).
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Tiger Trash v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 560 F.2d 818, 822 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
Baxter v. Paimigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 , 96 S.Ct. 1551 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976); see Arthurs v. Stern, 560 F.2d 477, 478 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 , 98 S.Ct. 768 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977); United States ex rel.
dictum