Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co. (1978)

green · 88 citation events across 32 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 2 Green 19

Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197920022026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow William Butler Smith v. Leman Hudson (1979)

But See · 6th Cir. · signal: but see

But see Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

yellow Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp. (1981)

But See · Iowa · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion

But see Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978)." Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60, 64 (6th Cir. 1979) cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979).

green State Department of Revenue v. Adolph Coors Co. (1986)

Quote Authority · Colo.

See, e.g., Tompkins v. DeLeon, 197 Colo. 569, 571 , 595 P.2d 242, 243-44 (1979) (“When the legislature reenacts or amends a statute and does not change a section previously interpreted by settled judicial construction, it is presumed that it agrees with judicial construction of the statute.”); Crownover v. Gleichman, 194 Colo. 48, 51 , 574 P.2d 497, 499 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (“when a legislature repeatedly reenacts a statu…

“when a legislature repeatedly reenacts a statute which has theretofore received a settled judicial construction, ... it must be considered that the particular statute is reenacted with the understanding that there be adherence by the judiciary to its former construction”

green Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-Mousson (1980)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e. g., Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon), 431 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ill.) aff'd, 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978). 137 See Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c), cited in full at note 135 supra 138 See, e. g., In re Equitable Plan Co., 185 F.Supp. 57 (S.D.N.Y.), mod. sub nom.

permitting such a mode of service

green Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a M… (1986)

Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see

See Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano and Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green National Business Systems, Inc. v. Am International, Inc. (1985)

Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 685 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); H.K.

green Sidney H. Ingbar, M.D. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated (1982)

Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: compare

Compare Romnes v. Bache & Co., Inc., supra. See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green Hagstrom v. Breutman (1984)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (arbitration is proper in a suit based upon alleged fraud in violation of the CEA); Romnes v. Bache & Co., 439 F.Supp. 833 (W.D.Wis.1977) (arbitration is available to resolve disputes concerning a partnership agreement the purpose of which was to trade commodity future contracts).

arbitration is proper in a suit based upon alleged fraud in violation of the CEA

green Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South Barrington (1997)

Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see

See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) SAL., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp. (1996)

Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see

See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green Pisciotta v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc. (1993)

Cited (see also) · D.C. · signal: see also

See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1202 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); Austern v. Chicago Bd. Options Exchange, 716 F.Supp. 121, 124 (S.D.N.Y.1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 882 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 850 , 111 S.Ct. 141 , 112 L.Ed.2d 107 (1990).

green Gentry v. Wallace (1992)

Cited (see also) · Miss. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Crownover v. Gleichman, 38 Colo. App. 96 , 554 P.2d 313, 316 (1975), aff'd., 194 Colo. 48 , 574 P.2d 497, 499 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); see also, Grimm v. Ford Motor Company, 157 Mich. App. 633 , 403 N.W.2d 482, 485 (1986); Price v. IT & T Corp., 651 F. Supp. 706, 711 (N.D.Miss. 1986) (Lee, J., granting defendant's summary judgment motion); Alexander v. Conveyors and Dumpers, Inc., 731 F.2d 1221, 1228 (5th Cir.1984…

Lee, J., granting defendant's summary judgment motion

green Diaz v. Diaz (In Re Diaz) (1989)

Cited · Bankr. N.D. Ind. · signal: see

See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. den. 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green David v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. (1989)

Cited (see also) · N.D. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); Corcoran v. Shearson/American Exp.

green Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. (1986)

Cited · N.D. Ind. · signal: see

However, this case arises under the Commodity Exchange Act and “nothing in the Commodity Exchange Act or its legislative history indicates a Congressional intent that agreements to arbitrate claims arising under the Commodity Exchange Act should not be enforceable under the United States Arbitration Act.” Corcoran v. Shearson/American Express, 596 F.Supp. 1113, 1116 (N.D.Ga.1984); see Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S…

green Zisman v. Sieger (1985)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see also

See Shoei Kako Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court, San Francisco, 33 Cal.App.3d 808, 820-22 , 109 Cal.Rptr. 402, 410-12 (1973); see also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L,, 431 F.Supp. 1226, 1228-29 (N.D.Ill.), aff 'd, 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); accord Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 589 F.Supp. 1182, 1206 (D.D.C.1984).

green Brown v. Trion Industries, Inc. (1983)

Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 682 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (claim invalid if the device disclosed “constitutes an impermissible enlargement of the original claims, the basis for which was not disclosed therein”); see also Leesona Corp. v. Varta Batteries, Inc., 522 F.Supp. 1304 (S.D.N.Y.1981); P. Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals, § 7.14 (2d Ed.1982).

claim invalid if the device disclosed “constitutes an impermissible enlargement of the original claims, the basis for which was not disclosed therein”

green Bennett v. Furr's Cafeterias, Inc. (1982)

Cited (see also) · D. Colo. · signal: see also

Compare Klamm Shell v. Berg, 165 Colo. 540 , 441 P.2d 10 (1968), with Dodge, supra; see, also, Crownover v. Gleichman, 194 Colo. 48 , 574 P.2d 497 (1977), cert denied 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc. (1981)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.

claim invalid if the device disclosed “constitutes an impermissible enlargement of the original claims, the basis for which was not disclosed therein”

green Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc. (1979)

Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see

See Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).

green Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook Cty. (1979)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 682-83 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978). 38 *1348 b.