Clyburn v. United States (1978)
green
· 185 citation events
across 49 courts.
Showing the 36 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
In Re Ben Jean Prevot and Arielle Dominique Prevot, the Minor Children. Jean-Claude Prevot v. Debra Moseman P… (1995)
But see U.S. v. Sacco, 571 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978), in which a question arose during trial of whether the government had relied upon allegedly improper wiretap evidence.
green
People v. Von Villas (1992)
In addition to Donaldson , in which the court expressly pointed out that Lanza had never been repudiated by the United States Supreme Court or other federal courts (Donaldson v. Superior Court, supra, 35 Cal.3d at pp. 28-30; see Ahmad A. v. Superior Court (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 528, 535 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 747 ]; People v. Elwood (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1365, 1370 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 585 ]; see also, United States v. Paul (6th Cir. 1980) 614 F.2d 115, 116 [61 A.L.R.Fed. 816], cert, den…
green
Tillett v. Hodel (1990)
Although Section 1302 of the Indian Civil Rights Act effectively imposes certain restrictions upon tribal governments similar, but not identical, to those contained in the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, Id. at 57 , 98 S.Ct. at 1656, federal court enforcement of the Indian Civil Rights Act is limited solely to habeas corpus review of tribal criminal proceedings, Id. at 67, 98 S.Ct. at 1681-82.
green
United States v. Larry Eugene McCollum (1984)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 516 F.2d 209, 212-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 859 , 96 S.Ct. 112 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975).
green
United States v. James W. Melanson (1981)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1347-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Aloisio, 440 F.2d 705, 710 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 824 , 92 S.Ct. 49 , 30 L.Ed.2d 51 (1971); United States ex rel.
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1344-46 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
Billy Gale Henry v. United States (1978)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978), in which the Ninth Circuit held that such interception did not violate the sixth amendment under Massiah.
green
United States v. James A. Saettele (1978)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1335 n.1 (9th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Michelson, 559 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 386 (7th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977). 13 Assuming arguendo that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a reasonable apprehension of injury, nothing in the record suggests tha…
See, e.g., Bordenkircher, 434 U.S. at 368 n. 2, 98 S.Ct. at 670 n. 2 (Blackmun, J., dissenting); United States v. Andrews, 612 F.2d 235 , 241-42 n. 7 (6th Cir.1979), reh'g en banc, 633 F.2d 449 (1980), cert. denied sub nom.
green
United States v. William A. Simpson (1993)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1339 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
William A. BROWN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIERRA NEVADA MEMORIAL MINERS HOSPITAL, Et Al., Defendants-Ap… (1988)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1337 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (trial court has discretion to determine the order in which parties should adduce proof at trial).
trial court has discretion to determine the order in which parties should adduce proof at trial
green
United States v. Bernard Joseph (1987)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1347 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (interagency exchange of evidence without warrant not violative of Fourth Amendment).
interagency exchange of evidence without warrant not violative of Fourth Amendment
green
United States v. Walter H. Kupau (1986)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld); see also United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 598-99 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 705 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld).
exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld
green
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc. (1986)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1977) (no abuse when evidence is cumulative), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978). 34 III.
green
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc. (1985)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1977) (no abuse when evidence is cumulative), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 535, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,085, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 978 Belen Torres, (83-1194),… (1985)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1351 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the "average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended").
testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the "average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended"
green
Torres v. County of Oakland (1985)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1351 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the “average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended”).
testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the “average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended”
green
Robert J. Neely v. Thomas Israel (1983)
See also United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1342 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
United States v. Stephen Gonsalves (1982)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 & n.2 (9th Cir. 1977) (duress), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Hermosillo-Nanez, 545 F.2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir. 1976) (entrapment), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1050 , 97 S.Ct. 763 , 50 L.Ed.2d 767 (1977).
entrapment
green
United States v. John D. Clardy (1980)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1336 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 .
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 516 F.2d 209, 212-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 859 , 96 S.Ct. 112 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975).
green
United States v. Harold Glickman AKA Hal Glickman, United States of America v. James Rowe (1979)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n.2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Monroe, 552 F.2d 860, 863 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 972 , 97 S.Ct. 2936 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1977).
green
United States v. Larry Joe Dooley (1979)
See also United States v. Hearst, 9 Cir., 1977, 563 F.2d 1331, 1338-44 , cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
Belmer v. Commonwealth (2001)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1345-46 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
Frendak v. United States (1979)
See Clyburn v. United States, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 260 , 263 n. 7 (1977) (dictum), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) ( Faretta does not overrule Whalem; it does not hold that a court must recognize an incompetent or insane defendant's right to self-representation). [19] Nevertheless, the underlying philosophy of Alford and Faretta is inconsistent with Whalem as currently interpreted.
Faretta does not overrule Whalem; it does not hold that a court must recognize an incompetent or insane defendant's right to self-representation
green
United States v. Hearst (1978)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Hearst, 435 F.Supp. 29 (N.D.Cal.1977); United States v. Hearst, 424 F.Supp. 307 (N.D.Cal. 1976). 11 .
green
Higgenbottom v. United States (2007)
See Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 263 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
Upshur v. United States (1999)
See Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 262 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (citing Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960)) (competency standard for purposes of trial is that defendant have "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer” and to understand the nature of the proceedings against him.) 7 .
green
State v. Strohl (1999)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S. Ct. 1656 , 56 L.
green
State v. Howard (1998)
See generally U.S. v. Hearst, 9th Cir., 563 F.2d 1331, 1345-46 (1977), reh’g denied, 9th Cir., 573 F.2d 579 (1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (finding that surreptitiously recording conversations between prisoner and visitor does not violate prisoner’s right to privacy when confronted with state's "justifiable purpose of imprisonment or prison security"); State v. Hauss, App., 142 Ariz. 159 , 688 P.2d 1051, 1054-55 (1984) (holding tha…
finding that surreptitiously recording conversations between prisoner and visitor does not violate prisoner’s right to privacy when confronted with state's "justifiable purpose of imprisonment or prison security"
green
United States v. Hirschfeld (1995)
Appeal of Silo, 845 F.2d 1015 (3d Cir.1988); Hall v. Dorsey, 534 F.Supp. 507 (D.Pa.1982); see also United States v. Sacco, 571 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (federal courts have consistently held that there is no right of the defendant to represent himself and be represented by counsel). 1 Thus, in order to ascertain Mr. Tweel’s status in this litigation and consequently to determine whether or not Mr. Hirschfeld was s…
federal courts have consistently held that there is no right of the defendant to represent himself and be represented by counsel
green
Simmons v. State (1988)
Compare United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1350-52 (9th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (psychiatrists testifying on behalf of the government were permitted to express their opinions that the defendant did not take part in a bank robbery because she was in fear of her life, but rather, engaged in the illegal activity voluntarily).
psychiatrists testifying on behalf of the government were permitted to express their opinions that the defendant did not take part in a bank robbery because she was in fear of her life, but rather, engaged in the illegal activity voluntarily
green
Thorne v. United States (1983)
See, e.g., Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 262-63 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
green
Nakao v. Rushen (1982)
Accord, *1093 United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1344-45 (9th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Vallez, 653 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 904 , 102 S.Ct. 412 , 70 L.Ed.2d 223 (1982).
green
Pegues v. United States (1980)
See Clyburn v. United States, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 260, 264 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).