How cited: Le Brun v. Cupp · Go Syfert

Le Brun v. Cupp (1978)

green · 83 citation events across 36 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but see
But see United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273, 1274-75 (3d Cir.1977) (distinguishing between government promise to take no position and promise to make no recommendation), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 (1978).
Quote Authority · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273, 1274 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978) (“[I]t is the rule of this Circuit that the Government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.”).
“[I]t is the rule of this Circuit that the Government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.”
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir.1977) (per cu- *107 riam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); but see id. at 1275 (Stern, J., dissenting).
Higginbotham, J., concurring
green State v. Brighter (2005)
Cited (see also) · Haw. App. · signal: see also
As the State correctly points out, however, “the overwhelming weight of authority is that a fundamental condition of any suspended sentence or probation, whether ex pressly stated or not, is that the defendant shall not violate the law.” State v. Hotter, 340 N.W.2d 691, 693 (S.D.1983); see also, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978); United States v. Cardenas-Yanez, 741 F.Supp. 21
green State v. Budgett (2001)
Cited (see also) · N.H. · signal: see also
As the State correctly points out, however, “the overwhelming weight of authority is that a fundamental condition of any suspended sentence or probation, whether expressly stated or not, is that the defendant shall not violate the law.” State v. Holter, 340 N.W.2d 691, 693 (S.D. 1983); see also, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 (1978); United States v. Cardenas-Yanez, 741 F. Supp. 212, 214 (S.D.
green State v. Jacques (1996)
Cited (see also) · Utah Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343, 348 (5th Cir.) (affirming trial court’s exclusion of nonexpert’s opinion concerning signature on a receipt when nonexpert made “one-shot” comparison with a genuine signature for purposes of pending criminal investigation), cer t. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
Cited · N.M.C.C.A. · signal: see
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); Military Rule of Evidence 901(b)(2).
green State v. Kunkel (1990)
Cited (see also) · N.D. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3075 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1978); State v. Holter, 340 N.W.2d 691 (S.D.1983); Jaynes v. State, 437 N.E.2d 137 (Ind.App.1982); Wilcox v. State, 395 So.2d 1054 (Ala.1981); State v. Austin, 295 N.W.2d 246 (Minn.1980); Commonwealth v. Mallon, 267 Pa.Super. 163 , 406 A.2d 569 (1979); State v. McGinnis, 243 N.W.2d 583 (Iowa 1976).
green United States v. Haley (1981)
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 , 349 n. 10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978) and United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1977).