How cited: Hall v. Anderson · Go Syfert

Hall v. Anderson (1978)

green · 77 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
But See · 1st Cir. · signal: but see
But see United States v. Campa, 679 F.2d 1006, 1014 (1st Cir.1982) (appellant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel "bears the burden of establishing actual prejudice”) (citing United States v. Ritch, 583 F.2d 1179, 1183 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978)).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360, 362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978) (same, in context of bank robbery). 3 Therefore, it is appropriate when addressing an aiding and abetting charge under 18 U.S.C.
same, in context of bank robbery
green United States v. McKee (2007)
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also
Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343, 352 , 85 S.Ct. 1004 , 13 L.Ed.2d 882 (1965) (crime of tax evasion is complete as soon as the false understatement of taxes is filed); see also United States v. Schafer, 580 F.2d 774 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 ; Swallow v. United States, 307 F.2d 81, 83 (10th Cir.1962), ce rt. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
United States v. McKinnell, 888 F.2d 669, 674-75 (10th Cir.1989); see United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360, 362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360, 362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360, 364 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978).
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ritch, 583 F.2d 1179, 1181 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also
In addition, this court has expressly approved the use of expert legal testimony in a case where an IRS agent "merely stated his opinion as an accountant [with regard to the tax consequences of a transaction], and did not attempt to assume the role of the court." United States v. Fogg, 652 F.2d 551, 556-57 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905 , 102 S.Ct. 1751 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); see also United States v. Schafer, 580 F.2d 774, 778 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,…
green United States v. Gold (1984)
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also
In addition, this court has expressly approved the use of expert legal testimony in a case where an IRS agent “merely stated his opinion as an accountant [with regard to the tax consequences of a transaction], and did not attempt to assume the role of the court.” United States v. Fogg, 652 F.2d 551, 556-57 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905 , 102 S.Ct. 1751 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); see also United States v. Schafer, 580 F.2d 774, 778 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,…
Cited (see also) · E.D. Va. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Schafer, 580 F.2d 774, 781 (5th Cir.) (recognizing that the government does not have to prove an evil motive or bad intent in a tax case), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed.2d 430 (1978); United States v. Dillon, 566 F.2d 702, 704 (10th Cir.1977) (stating that the government does not have to show that a defendant acted with bad purpose or evil motive to be convicted under 26 U.S.C. § 7203 ). 49 .
Cited · D.V.I. · signal: see
See United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S. Ct. 463 , 58 L.