Sedgwick v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia (1979)
green
· 110 citation events
across 25 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. McGregor (2011)
As stated, Rule 26.2(e) applies where a party “disobeys an order to produce or deliver a statement,” while § 3500(d) of the Jencks Act applies, “[i]f the United States elects not to comply with an order of the court ... to deliver to the defendant any such statement.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 26.2(e) (emphasis added); 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (d) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Dupuy, 760 F.2d 1492, 1497 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that the government’s late disclosure of a statement b…
“Courts have found that late disclosure caused no prejudice in instances where an opportunity for full cross-examination had been provided and where the trial court found no bad faith on the prosecutor’s part.”
green
United States v. Daniel Nelson Silva (1984)
See United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011 , 1019 n. 1 (10th Cir.1978), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 439 U.S. 1075 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979).
green
United States v. Tony William Wables (1984)
See also United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011, 1018-19 (10th Cir.1978) (trial court adequately remedied government’s failure to disclose Jencks Act statements by ordering production of statements and allowing recross-examination of witnesses, where government acted in good faith, defendant could not show prejudice, and no motion to strike testimony was made), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979); United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856, 892-94 (9…
green
United States v. William Bradshaw (1983)
See also United States v. Cox, 580 F.2d 317, 322 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 851 , 59 L.Ed.2d 43 (1979). 4 .
See also United States v. Saenz, 578 F.2d 643 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979) (roving Border Patrol officers must have reasonable suspicion to search vehicle); United States v. DeWitt, 569 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1978) (same); United States v. George, 567 F.2d 643 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Villarreal, 565 F.2d 932 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Lopez, 564 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Escamilla, 560 F.2d …
same
See United States v. Cox, 580 F.2d 317, 323 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 851 , 59 L.Ed.2d 43 (1979); United States v. White, 562 F.2d 587, 589 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Hutchinson, 488 F.2d at 490 .
green
United States v. Joe Lucero Leyba (1980)
See, United States v. Saenz, 578 F.2d 643, 647 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1975) (car swerved as defendant frequently glanced at rearview mirror).
green
Jenkins v. State (1995)
See United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011, 1018 , 1018 n. 1 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979) (where there was close cooperation between local police and federal prosecutor, federal prosecutor cannot “stand on technicality and say that he does not have actual possession” of the statement held by local authorities); Augenblick v. United States, 377 F.2d. 586, 597-98 , 180 Ct.Cl. 131 (1967) (“statement” under Jeneks Act “need not…
where there was close cooperation between local police and federal prosecutor, federal prosecutor cannot “stand on technicality and say that he does not have actual possession” of the statement held by local authorities
green
Brooks v. State (1995)
See United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011 , 1018 n. 1 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979); Jenkins v. State, No. 71,040, slip op. at 6, — S.W.2d -, - (Tex.Crim.App., May 5, 1993) (not yet reported).
not yet reported
green
United States v. Diggs (1992)
However, “[t]he fact that [defendant’s] statement was made to a state [official] does not make the rule inapplicable.” United States v. Mitchell, 613 F.2d 779, 781 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 919 , 100 S.Ct. 1283 , 63 L.Ed.2d 604 (1980); see also United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011 , 1018-19 & n. 1 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979); United States v. Jensen, 608 F.2d 1349, 1357 (10th Cir.1979) (under Rule 16, “[t]here…