How cited: Washington v. Cupp · Go Syfert

Washington v. Cupp (1979)

green · 49 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Washington v. Cupp, 586 F.2d 134, 137 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2003 , 60 L.Ed.2d 379 (1979) ("victim provided a specific and detailed description").
"victim provided a specific and detailed description"
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: accord · 4 citations in this opinion
Although the district court's factual finding to this effect was clearly erroneous, the Court agrees with the district court's implicit legal conclusion (i.e., that Asher's cross-examination was the proper focus of the factual inquiry) 9 For instance, Rule 801(d)(2), which like Rule 801(d)(1) is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible to show the truth of the matter asserted, is triggered when the admission of a party-opponent "is offered again…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Washington v. Cupp, 586 F.2d 134, 136 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2003 , 60 L.Ed.2d 379 (1979).
green People v. Yates (1983)
Cited · Ill. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Cassasa (9th Cir. 1978), 588 F.2d 282, 284-85 , cert. denied (1979), 441 U.S. 909 , 60 L.