How cited: Nicholas v. United States · Go Syfert

Nicholas v. United States (1979)

green · 63 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Quote Authority · W.D. Pa.
E.g., United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 408-09 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979) (“Rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.”); United States v. Martin, 562 F.2d 673 , 680 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.1977) (Court in dictum states that the only justification for excluding evidence of prior convictions of the type recognized by Fed.R.Evid. 609(a)(1) is when prejudicial impact on criminal def…
“Rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.”
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1196 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979); United States v. Miroyan, 577 F.2d 489 , 492 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 896 , 99 S.Ct. 258 , 58 L.Ed.2d 243 (1978); United States v. Pretzinger, 542 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Hufford, 539 F.2d 32, 34 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also
United States v. Butts, 729 F.2d 1514, 1517 (5th Cir.1984); see also, United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979); Erickson, 732 F.2d at 790 .
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1197 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See United States v. Knotts, - U.S. -, ---, 103 S.Ct. 1081, 1086 , 75 L.Ed.2d 55 (1983) (use of beeper to monitor progress of automobile on public highway did not invade any legitimate expectation of privacy); see also, e.g., United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979) (no expectation of privacy in airborne location of plane).
no expectation of privacy in airborne location of plane
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 408 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
green State v. Strayer (1988)
Cited (see also) · Kan. · signal: see also
The movement of an airplane in the sky, like that of an automobile on a highway is not something in which a. person can claim a reasonable expectation of privacy.’ United States v. Butts, 729 F.2d 1514, 1517 (5th Cir. 1984); see also, United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S. Ct. 94 , 62 L.