How cited: Guntharp v. Planters Oil Mill · Go Syfert

Guntharp v. Planters Oil Mill (1980)

green · 214 citation events across 53 courts. Showing the 30 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
But See · S.D.N.Y. · signal: but see
Dec. 11, 1986); Nemo v. Allen, 466 F.Supp. 192, 195-96 (S.D.N.Y.1979); DeWitt v. American Stock Transfer Co., 433 F.Supp. 994, 1005 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Smith v. Murchison, 310 F.Supp. 1079, 1088 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (private right of action under 13(a) "very doubtful"); but see Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 731 (8th Cir.1979) (assuming existence of private right of action under 13(a), complaint fails to state a claim), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed…
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Id., at 292 , 100 S.Ct. at 564 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
Quote Authority · 5th Cir.
Co. v. Neal, 669 F.2d 300, 303 (5th Cir.1982). 7 See, e.g., Apple Barrel Prods., Inc., 730 F.2d at 389 ("In order to obtain preliminary injunctive relief, the movant must carry the burden of persuasion on each of the elements of the four prong test."); Southern Monorail Co. v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., 666 F.2d 185, 186 (5th Cir.1982) ("A preliminary injunction may not issue unless the movant carries the burden of persuasion as to all four prerequisites."); Spiegel v. City of H…
"The remedy should not be granted unless the movant carries the burden of persuasion concerning all four of these criteria."
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 *1183 (1980).
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Marty’s Floor Covering Co. v. GAF Corp., 604 F.2d 266, 268 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (“Only prospective relief is afforded by this section [144].
“Only prospective relief is afforded by this section [144]. It can not be used as a means of obtaining a new trial.”
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Ct. 668, 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: accord · 3 citations in this opinion
The incidents of seniority can be freely altered or amended by modification of the collective agreement.” Local 1251, UAW v. Robertshaw Controls Co., 405 F.2d 29, 33 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc); accord, Ekas v. Carling Nat’l Breweries, Inc., 602 F.2d 664 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Baskin v. Parker, 602 F.2d 1205, 1210 (5th Cir. 1979) (rejecting the same erroneous construction of Carey).
rejecting the same erroneous construction of Carey
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir. 1969).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291-92 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such that suit “does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”); Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review).
de novo review
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Id.; see also Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 114 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
McCarthy, Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 11:16 (2d ed. 1984); see, e.g., Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 119 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Educational Development Corp. v. Economy Co., 562 F.2d 26, 28 (10th Cir. 1977).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Baskin v. Parker, 602 F.2d 1205, 1210 (5th Cir.1979) (rejecting the same erroneous construction of Carey).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 118 (5th Cir. 1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980). 8 .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 730-31 (8th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (section 13(a)).
section 13(a)
green Herrera v. Valentine (1981)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Burt v. Abel, 585 F.2d 613, 615-616 (4th Cir. 1978); Mickens v. Winston, 462 F.Supp. 910, 913 (E.D.Va.1978), aff’d, 609 F.2d 508 (4th Cir. 1979).
green Herrera v. Valentine (1981)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 17 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Burt v. Abel, 585 F.2d 613, 615-616 (4th Cir. 1978); Mickens v. Winston, 462 F.Supp. 910, 913 (E.D.Va.1978), aff'd, 609 F.2d 508 (4th Cir. 1979).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 727-30 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (applying Delaware law); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619, 629-36 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920, 926-30 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979) (applying New York law).
applying Delaware law
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Konczak v. Tyrrell, 603 F.2d 13, 18 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Ekas v. Carling Nat’l Breweries, Inc., 602 F.2d 664 (4th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 669 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Long v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 42 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
Cited · M.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 115-16 (5th Cir.1979) (describing the definitions of and the degree of protection for generic, descriptive, suggestive, and arbitrary or fanciful terms), 2 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980).
Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see
See Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111, 118 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980)(emphasis on word “Pearle” in “Pearle Vision Center,” where vision center was merely descriptive, negated any charge of deception or unfair competition).
emphasis on word “Pearle” in “Pearle Vision Center,” where vision center was merely descriptive, negated any charge of deception or unfair competition
Cited · S.D. Miss. · signal: see
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969).
Cited (see also) · M.D. Fla. · signal: see also
See also, Discount Muffler Shop, Inc. v. Meineke Realty Corp., 535 F.Supp. 439, 444 (N.D.Ohio, 1982) (citing Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980)).
Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Marty’s Floor Covering Co. v. GAF Corp., 604 F.2d 266, 270 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980); Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. FTC, 191 F.2d 786 , 792 (7th Cir.1951), cert. dismissed, 344 U.S. 206 , 73 S.Ct. 245 , 97 L.Ed. 245 (1952).
green Black v. NuAire, Inc. (1988)
Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980) (construing Delaware law); Lewis, 615 F.2d at 780 (construing California law); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979).
construing Delaware law
Cited · W.D. La. · signal: see
See Vision Ctr. v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969).
Cited · W.D. La. · signal: see
See, Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1016 , 100 S.Ct. 668 , 62 L.Ed.2d 646 (1980); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 408 F.2d 506 (2d Cir.1969), but see, Hesmer Foods, Inc. v. Campbell Soup Company, 346 F.2d 356 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 839 , 86 S.Ct. 89 , 15 L.Ed.2d 81 (1965) (barbecue beans used as description, not as trademark).
green Stein v. Bailey (1982)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
This doctrine has often been considered one aspect of the “business judgment” rule, which *691 “bars judicial inquiry into actions of directors taken in good faith and in honest pursuit of the legitimate purposes of the corporation.” Galef v. Alexander, 615 F.2d 51, 57 (2d Cir. 1980); see Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 603 F.2d 724, 729-30 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980); Abramowitz v. Posner, 513 F.Supp. 120, 125-26 (S.D.N.…
Cited · S.D. Iowa · signal: see
See Abbey v. Control Data Corp., 460 F.Supp. 1242, 1245 (D.Minn.1978), aff’d, 603 F.2d 724 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 1017 , 100 S.Ct. 670 , 62 L.Ed.2d 647 (1980).