How cited: 1776 K Street Associates v. United States · Go Syfert

1776 K Street Associates v. United States (1980)

green · 319 citation events across 51 courts. Showing the 41 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Quote Authority · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Rather, “the judgment is merely one way in which the underlying tax liability remains enforceable, and therefore the judgment serves merely as a measuring rod for the life of the lien.” United States v. Hodes, 355 F.2d 746, 749 (2d Cir.1966), cert. dismissed, 386 U.S. 901 , 87 S.Ct. 784 , 17 L.Ed.2d 779 (1967); see United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612 , 620-21 & n. 30 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (“There is no time l…
“There is no time limit whatsoever on an action to enforce a timely filed levy or judgment obtained in a timely filed court proceeding.”
Quote Authority · 6th Cir. · signal: see
Rather, 'the judgment is merely one way in which the underlying tax liability remains enforceable, and therefore the judgment serves merely as a measuring rod for the life of the lien.' United States v. Hodes, 355 F.2d 746, 749 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed, 386 U.S. 901 (1967); see United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612 , 620-21 & n.30 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 (1980) ('There is no time limit whatsoever on an action to enforce a timely filed levy or ju…
'There is no time limit whatsoever on an action to enforce a timely filed levy or judgment obtained in a timely filed court proceeding.'
Quote Authority · N.D. Ill.
United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 619-20 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (“There is no time limit whatsoever on an action ... to enforce a timely levy or judgment obtained in a timely filed court proceeding.”); United States v. Hodes, 355 F.2d at 748 (“The institution of a suit to enforce the hen of a tax liability extends the life of an assessment hen beyond the normal six-year period.”); Ettelson, 159 F.2d at 196 …
“There is no time limit whatsoever on an action ... to enforce a timely levy or judgment obtained in a timely filed court proceeding.”
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich.
In addition, neither the Supreme Court nor this Circuit has indicated that Summerlin or its progeny is no longer good law, United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 618-19 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (“This rule is of such long standing that we do not believe the Supreme Court would carve out an exception without expressly saying so.”); See United States v. Republic Insurance Co., 775 F.2d 156, 159 (6th Cir.1985) (discu…
“This rule is of such long standing that we do not believe the Supreme Court would carve out an exception without expressly saying so.”
Quote Authority · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
See also United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 619 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (“While the general rule ... is that the sovereign is exempt from the operation of statutes of limitations, an exception to that general rule exists when the sovereign (through the legislature) expressly imposes a limitation period upon itself.”).
“While the general rule ... is that the sovereign is exempt from the operation of statutes of limitations, an exception to that general rule exists when the sovereign (through the legislature) expressly imposes a limitation period upon itself.”
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); see also, Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2778-79 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987); United States v. Gomez, 810 F.2d 947, 950 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 2488 , 96 L.Ed.2d 379 (1987).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. McClure, 734 F.2d 484, 487-491 (10th Cir.1984) and United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1331-1332 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1330-31 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
“The evidence — both direct and circumstantial, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom — is sufficient if, when taken in the light most favorable to the government, the fact finder may find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Yates, 470 F.2d 968, 970 (10th Cir.1972) (quoting United States v. Ortiz, 445 F.2d 1100, 1103 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 993 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 545 (1971)); see also United State…
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330, 1340 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 78 , 62 L.Ed.2d 51 (1979).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1330 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: accord
Accord, United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 618 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Wein-traub, 613 F.2d 612, 614-18 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); cf. United States v. Eiland, 223 F.2d 118, 121 (4th Cir.1955).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc., 602 F.2d 747, 752 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
On the other side of the issue there is a line of authority, relied upon by the government, holding that “the United States is not bound by state statutes of limitation or subject to the defense of laches in enforcing its rights.” United States v. Summerlin, 310 U.S. 414, 416 , 60 S.Ct. 1019, 1020 , 84 L.Ed. 1283 (1940); see also United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 619 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
NLRB v. Air Control Products, 335 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.1964); see NLRB v. Metro-Truck Body, *407 Inc., 613 F.2d 746, 749-50 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. First National State Bank of New Jersey, 616 F.2d 668, 673-74 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (explaining why 1099 and 1087 forms sent to the IRS by third party recordkeepers may be nonretrievable). 18 Following Davis, we find that although some of the requested information may technically be in the "possession" of the IRS, being incapable of practical retrieval they are not availably possessed by the I…
explaining why 1099 and 1087 forms sent to the IRS by third party recordkeepers may be nonretrievable
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. First National State Bank of New Jersey, 616 F.2d 668, 673-74 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (explaining why 1099 and 1087 forms sent to the IRS by third party recordkeepers may be nonretrieva-ble).
explaining why 1099 and 1087 forms sent to the IRS by third party recordkeepers may be nonretrieva-ble
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313 , 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2986 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Stanchich, 550 F.2d 1294, 1297-99 (2d Cir.1977); United States v. Petroz ziello, 548 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1977).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2986 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Stanchich, 550 F.2d 1294, 1297-99 (2d Cir.1977); United States v. Petrozziello, 548 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1977).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 210.08[1]; see also United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668 , 671 n.4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See 9 Moore's Federal Practice P 210.08(1); see also United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668 , 671 n.4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Sadlowski v. Marshall, 464 F.Supp. 858 (D.D.C.) (rejecting Sadlowski’s challenge to the Department of Labor’s refusal to bring suit to challenge the election), aff'd mem., No. 79-1461 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905, 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980). .
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Sadlowski v. Marshall, 464 F.Supp. 858 (D.D.C.) (rejecting Sadlowski's challenge to the Department of Labor's refusal to bring suit to challenge the election), aff'd mem., No. 79-1461 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) 5 Plaintiffs have requested that any remand be to a different judge and magistrate than the ones who have heard this case since its inception.
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Sadlowski v. Marshall, 464 F.Supp. 858 (D.D.C.), aff'd mem., No. 79-1461 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980). 4 The next biennial convention of the Union in 1978 enacted Article V, Section 27 (set forth as an Appendix to this opinion) as an amendment to the Union Constitution.
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Sadlowski v. Marshall, 464 F.Supp. 858 (D.D.C.), aff’d mem., No. 79-1461 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., United *800 States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
green People v. Montoya (1988)
Cited · Colo. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1330 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 854 (1980); United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313 (10th Cir.) cert. denied 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980) (holding a pretrial James hearing is not required in this circuit, the parties need only follow the preferred order of proof rule).
holding a pretrial James hearing is not required in this circuit, the parties need only follow the preferred order of proof rule
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Klein, 474 F.Supp. 1243 , 1246 n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 614 F.2d 1292 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 853 (1980).
Cited (see also) · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Petersen, 611 F.2d 1313, 1327 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited (see also) · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also 1776 K Street Assoc. v. United States, 602 F.2d 354, 357 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2985 , 64 L.Ed.2d 853 (1980).
green In re Stubbs (2017)
Cited · 6th Cir. BAP · signal: see
See United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 619 (6th Cir. 1979) (The doctrine of laches did not bar the IRS from collecting from a third party after a delay of 13 years as the service sought to collect from the taxpayer upon whom the third- Nos. 16-8025/8027 In re Stubbs Page 13 party’s liability was predicated.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S. Ct. 2987 (1980).
Cited · 6th Cir. BAP · signal: see
See United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 619 (6th Cir. 1979) (The doctrine of laches did not bar the IRS from collecting from a third party after a delay of 13 years as the service sought to collect from the taxpayer upon whom the third-party’s liability was predicated.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · N.D. Ohio · signal: accord
Accord, United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 618 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see
See generally United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 622 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
Cited · M.D. Tenn. · signal: accord
The Bank can raise only two defenses against the Government’s efforts to enforce its lien: either it was not in possession of property of the taxpayer which was subject to levy or the taxpayer’s property it was in possession of was subject to a prior judicial attachment or execution. 26 U.S.C. § 6332 (a); accord, United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 616, 622-23 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Citizen…
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See United States v. First National State Bank of New Jersey, 616 F.2d 668, 671 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); United States v. Garden State National Bank, supra, 607 F.2d at 70 .
green Piontek v. Ceritano (1981)
Cited (see also) · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see also
See, also, United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 621-623 (6 Cir. 1979), cert. den. 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); Magavern v. United States, 550 F.2d 797 (2 Cir. 1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 74 , 54 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977); United States v. Sterling Nat.