How cited: Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Stevens · Go Syfert

Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Stevens (1981)

green · 133 citation events across 37 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Cited (see also) · SCOTUS · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Farris, 624 F. 2d 890 (CA9 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1111 (1981), discussed in n. 13, infra. Nor does Pub.
green United States v. Lane (1986)
Cited · SCOTUS · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F. 2d 830, 843 (CA2 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1111 (1981); United States v. Seidel, 620 F. 2d 1006 (CA4 1980); United States v. Hatcher, 680 F. 2d 438, 442 (CA6 1982); United States v. Varelli, 407 F. 2d 735, 747-748 (CA7 1969); United States v. Martin, 567 F. 2d 849, 854 (CA9 1977); Baker v. United States, 131 U. S. App. D.
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Rather the scope of section 1152 is limited to the applicability or non-applicability of federal enclave laws, those laws passed by the federal government in the exercise of its police powers over federal property and now defined in the United States Code in terms of “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” 18 U.S.C. § 7 . *1004 722 F.2d at 385 (quoting United States v. White, 508 F.2d 453, 454-55 (8th Cir.1974)); see also United States v. Farris…
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830 , 834 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 839 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981); United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 607 (3rd Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 834-35 (2d Cir.1980) (border search exception applies to searches of persons departing country as well as to searches of persons entering the country), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981); United States v. Swarovski, 592 F.2d 131, 133 (2d Cir.1979) (same).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983) (state law regulates bingo, so bingo not forbidden to Indians by ACA) and Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982) (same) with Marcyes, 557 F.2d at 1364 (although state law allows limited use of fireworks it is essen…
state law essentially prohibits gambling so it applies to reservation via Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (1976)
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 834-36 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 837 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981) (goods stolen from dock before shipped overseas are in foreign commerce for purposes of § 2314 violation despite the fact not crossed a national border); United States v. Franklin, 568 F.2d 1156, 1157 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 955 , 98 S.Ct. 1588 , 55 L.Ed.2d 807 (1978) (court interpreting identical language of 18 U.S.C. § 659 to th…
goods stolen from dock before shipped overseas are in foreign commerce for purposes of § 2314 violation despite the fact not crossed a national border
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1981) (operating gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 ); United States v. Olvera, 488 F.2d 607 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 917 , 94 S.Ct. 1625 , 40 L.Ed.2d 119 (1974) (possession of amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 (a).
operating gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 839 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
Cited (see also) · E.D. Wash. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890, 898 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 919 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1981).
green Langley v. Ryder (1985)
Cited (see also) · W.D. La. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare 18 U.S.C. § 13 (state criminal law applies as surrogate federal law in federal enclaves for offenses that are not otherwise punishable under federal law) and 18 U.S.C. § 1152 (federal enclave laws apply in Indian country to offenses committed by Indians) and United States v. Sosseur, 181 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1950) (Wisconsin criminal law against conducting gambling operations applied as surrogate federal law in Wisconsin Indian country through sections 13 and 1152) with…
section 1955 applied to Indian operators of Indian country casinos
Cited (see also) · Wis. Att'y Gen. · signal: compare
Compare United States v. Farris , 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied , 449 U.S. 1111 (1981) and Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, San Diego County, Cal. v. Duffy , 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir. 1982) with United States v. Dakota , 796 F.2d 186 (6th Cir. 1986).
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See United States v. Ajlouny, 476 F.Supp. 995, 999 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd on other grounds, 629 F.2d 830 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981) (evidence of defendant’s P.L.O. connection did not warrant dismissal of the indictment).
evidence of defendant’s P.L.O. connection did not warrant dismissal of the indictment
Cited · Okla. · signal: see
See, United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 , 894 [9th Cir.1980], cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 [1981].