How cited: Errico v. United States · Go Syfert

Errico v. United States (1981)

green · 43 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198120032026
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1260-61 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Halperin v. Kissinger, 606 F.2d 1192, 1204-05 (D.C.Cir.1979), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 452 U.S. 713 , 101 S.Ct. 3132 , 69 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Erri co, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1256 (D.C.Cir. 1980) (“doctrine of immunity assumes official error”), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 242 , 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1689 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (“Implicit in the idea that officials have some immunity ... is a recognition that they may err.”); see also Heidelberg v. Hammer, 577 F.2d 429, 432 (7th Cir.1978) (distinguishing the defense of “absolute immunity” from “f…
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980) (a group of bettors linked to a group of jockeys through the defendant constitute an enterprise where all were acting with the purpose of “fixing” horse races), cert denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1265-66 (D.C.Cir.1980) (rejecting claim of abuse of discretion based on stay of discovery in case against federal officials), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980) (a network *23 of jockeys and bettors, who joined together for the single illegal purpose of betting on “fixed” horseraces, constituted an “enterprise” for the purposes of RICO), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
green Vanover v. Hantman (1999)
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
See also Chagnon v. Bell, 468 F.Supp. 927, 933 (D.D.C.1979) (holding that declaratory judgment is appropriate if challenged government activity is “continuing” and “casts what may well be a substantial adverse effect upon the interests of the petitioning parties.”) (citation and internal quotations omitted), aff'd, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
green Halperin v. Kissinger (1989)
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: accord
See Keith, 407 U.S. at 322 , 92 S.Ct. at 2139 ; accord Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1262 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Cited · N.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Jury Instructions, supra, H 52.04 at 52-36.
green Halperin v. Kissinger (1984)
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
As late as 1972 the Supreme Court had “declined to delineate ‘precise standards for domestic security warrants.’ ” Id. at 169, quoting United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 , 92 S.Ct. 2125 , 32 L.Ed.2d 752 (1972); see also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
green Halperin v. Kissinger (1984)
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
As late as 1972 the Supreme Court had "declined to delineate `precise standards for domestic security warrants.'" Id. at 169, quoting United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 , 92 S.Ct. 2125 , 32 L.Ed.2d 752 (1972); see also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).