Sellars v. Procunier (1981)
green
· 175 citation events
across 40 courts.
Showing the 27 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Neal (1994)
The Court will note only that initial joinder is generally held to be proper where, as here, the indictment includes RICO counts that link all defendants to the conspiracy, United States ______________ v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 16 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 494 __________ _____ ______ U.S. 1082 (1990), and "[embrace] all of the acts and transactions upon which the other . . . counts [are] based." United States v. ________________ Boylan, 898 F.2d 230, 245 (1st Cir. 1990), …
"We review a trial court's denial of a severance motion for abuse of discretion and reverse only if denial deprived defendant of a fair trial, resulting in a miscarriage of justice"
green
United States v. Neal (1994)
The Court will note only that initial joinder is generally held to be proper where, as here, the indictment includes RICO counts that link all defendants to the conspiracy, United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 16 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990), and "[embrace] all of the acts and transactions upon which the other . . . counts [are] based." United States v. Boylan, 898 F.2d 230, 245 (1st Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 849 (1990)(quoting United States …
"We review a trial court's denial of a severance motion for abuse of discretion and reverse only if denial deprived defendant of a fair trial, resulting in a miscarriage of justice"
For example, parole board officials enjoy absolute immunity from 19 suit “when processing parole applications.” Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302 (9th Cir.), 20 cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 751 (9th Cir. 21 2009) (“[P]arole board members are entitled to absolute immunity for parole board decisions.”). 22 Further, plaintiffs have not demonstrated that such due process claims were not extinguished 23 upon the death of …
“[P]arole board members are entitled to absolute immunity for parole board decisions.”
green
Cleavinger v. Saxner (1985)
See, e. g., Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F. 2d 1295, 1303 (CA9), cert. denied, 454 U. S. 1102 (1981); Evans v. Dillahunty, 711 F. 2d 828, 830-831 (CA8 1983); United States ex rel.
green
Daniel Johnson v. Joe Kegans and John Holmes (1989)
See, e.g., Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981).
green
Patrick James Campbell v. Henry Burgess Thomas Craig (1991)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981).
See Anderson v. Boyd, 714 F.2d 906, 908-09 (9th Cir.1983) (citing Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981)). 2 5 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
green
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr. v. Dennis Marsh, Executive Secretary, Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (1991)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981).
green
United States v. Charles Frances West, Jr., United States of America v. Bradley David Thomas, United States o… (1989)
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 837-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
green
United States v. West (1989)
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 837-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
green
United States v. Tanya Mann (1987)
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 842 (1st Cir.) (reversing aiding and abetting convictions for government’s failure to prove principal’s requisite intent), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981).
See United States v. Thomas, 449 F.2d at 1187 ; see also United States v. Moore, 653 F.2d 384, 390 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 680 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981) (jurisdiction using more “coercive” Allen charge gives trial court complete discretion to issue the charge once jury has reached an impasse *891 after a reasonable amount of time).
jurisdiction using more “coercive” Allen charge gives trial court complete discretion to issue the charge once jury has reached an impasse *891 after a reasonable amount of time
See United States v. Tashjian, 660 F.2d 829, 833 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); Luna, 585 F.2d at 4 .
green
Billy Irl Glover v. Bruce Tower, Public Defender of Douglas County, Oregon and Gary Babcock, Public Defender … (1983)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 ,1299 n. 7 (9th Cir.), cert., denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981); see also Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 , 102 S.Ct. 445 , 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981) (public defender is the functional equivalent of a privately retained attorney).
See also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 , 1298-1300 & nn. 6-9 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981).
green
Harlow v. Clatterbuck (1986)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.), cert. *185 denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981); Douglas v. Muncy, 570 F.2d 499 (4th Cir.1978); Pope v. Chew, 521 F.2d 400 (4th Cir.1975); Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1974); Silver v. Dickson, 403 F.2d 642 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 990 , 89 S.Ct. 1477 , 22 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969); Siess v. McConnell, 74 Mich.App. 613 , 255 N.W.2d 2 (1977) (parole board members immune from suit ar…
green
(PC) Brooks v. Newsom (2024)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 26 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. California, 384 27 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 28 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing investigatory or 1 law enforcement functions).
parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 28 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing investigatory or 1 law enforcement functions
green
(PC) Correa v. Shaffer (2023)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 25 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. California, 384 26 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 27 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing investigatory or law 28 enforcement functions).
parole officers not entitled to absolute immunity for 27 conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing investigatory or law 28 enforcement functions
green
(PC) Brooks v. Newsom (2023)
See Sellars v. 14 Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. 15 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute 16 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing 17 investigatory or law enforcement functions).
parole officers not entitled to absolute 16 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., in performing 17 investigatory or law enforcement functions
green
(PC) Victory v. Shaffer (2023)
See Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 1 Under the Due Process Clause, the standard analysis “proceeds in two steps: We first ask 2 whether there exists a liberty or property interest of which a person has been deprived, and if so 3 we ask whether the procedures followed by the State were constitutionally sufficient.” Cooke, at 4 219.
green
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer (2019)
See Sellars v. 5 Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); cf. Swift v. 6 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 2004) (parole officers not entitled to absolute 7 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing 8 investigatory or law enforcement functions).
parole officers not entitled to absolute 7 immunity for conduct independent of Board’s decision-making authority, e.g., performing 8 investigatory or law enforcement functions
green
Quartararo v. Catterson (1996)
With respect to the first factor — which considers the need for absolute immunity in order to permit the effective performance of the function — it is clear to the Court that in view of the high emotions that are generated, and the related likelihood of litigation that can be expected to ensue from a parole release decision where an inmate’s liberty is at stake, absolute immunity is necessary to serve the public interest “in order that the official not, out of fear of exposu…
green
State v. Padilla (1994)
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkins, 659 F.2d 769, 773 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 681 , 70 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); Williams v. State, 271 Ind. 656 , 395 N.E.2d. 239, 245 (1979).
green
Scott v. Central Maine Power Co. (1989)
The Court disclaimed any similarity between the discipline committee and the traditional parole board, which is “a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body” serving “essentially ‘as an arm of the sentencing judge.’ ” Id. at 204 , 106 S.Ct. at 502 (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2604 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)); see also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 , 1302 n. 15 (9th Cir.) (parole board officials absolutely immune from suit for damages), cert. d…
green
Conner v. Alston (1988)
See also Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 , 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 (1981) (describing similarity of judge’s and parole officer’s functions).
describing similarity of judge’s and parole officer’s functions
green
Paoli v. Lally (1986)
See, e.g., Sellars v. Procurer, 641 F.2d 1295, 1303 (CA9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 [ 102 S.Ct. 678 , 70 L.Ed.2d 644 ] (1981); Evans v. Dillahunty, 711 F.2d 828, 830-31 (CA8 1983); United States ex rel.
green
Santangelo v. State (1984)
Compare Sellars v Procunier (641 F2d 1295, cert den 454 US 1102 ) and Douglas v Muncy (570 F2d 499) giving absolute immunity to parole officials, with Fowler v Cross (635 F2d 476) and Thompson v Burke (556 F2d 231) according them only qualified immunity; see, also, Anderson v New York State Div. of Parole ( 546 F Supp 816 ) granting absolute immunity (see discussion, p 28).