Hicks v. Rose (1982)
green
· 164 citation events
across 34 courts.
Showing the 16 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Jack Howard Potts, Cross-Appellant v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, C… (1984)
See, e.g., United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) (“To succeed on a claim of double jeopardy, a defendant must show that in law and fact the two offenses charged are in reality the same.”) (emphasis added); United States v. Cala, 521 F.2d 605, 607 (2d Cir.1975).
“To succeed on a claim of double jeopardy, a defendant must show that in law and fact the two offenses charged are in reality the same.”
green
Woodard v. Villmer (2019)
Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564-66 (1974) (officials have discretion to limit access to protect legitimate goals); Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 543 (5th Cir.1981) (right of access to information to prepare a defense not unqualified), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 (1982). 2006) (“[s]tates need not implement all possible procedural safeguards against erroneous deprivation of liberty when utilizing results of scientific testing devices in accusatory proceedings”) citing …
“[s]tates need not implement all possible procedural safeguards against erroneous deprivation of liberty when utilizing results of scientific testing devices in accusatory proceedings”
See Adamson v. Hill, 667 F.2d 1030 (9th Cir., 1983), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) 2 The judge asked "At this point do you believe you understand the provisions of the plea agreement?" Adamson answered "Entirely sir." The judge then asked Adamson "Do you have any questions that you want to ask me about before we go any further?" and Adamson answered "No sir." Transcript, Change of Plea, January 15, 1977, at 7 3 Paragraph 5 of the plea ag…
green
Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. Peter Carlson, Warden (1989)
See, e.g., Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1981).
green
United States v. Richard Lee Atkins (1987)
Id. at 153 ; accord United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
green
United States v. Albert W. Coachman (1984)
See also United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982); United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315, 1319 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
green
Nathaniel Dudley, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. D. Lamar Stewart (1984)
See also Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 543 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (transfer to maximum security is “obviously a deprivation of ‘liberty’ ” and entitles prisoner to minimal due process, citing Wolff), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 .
See, e.g., United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982); United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d 151, 154 (5th Cir.1978).
green
United States v. Reginald Chavers (2011)
See Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) (observing that defendant’s “claim to pretrial bail was moot once he was convicted” (emphasis in original)).
observing that defendant’s “claim to pretrial bail was moot once he was convicted” (emphasis in original)
green
Broussard v. Johnson (1996)
In addition, the determination of the factfinder must be supported by “some evidence in the record.” Id.; see also Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
green
Nettles v. Griffith (1995)
See Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 542 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
green
Vasquez v. Coughlin (1989)
See Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 546 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
green
Grandison v. Cuyler (1984)
See, e.g., Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir.1981) (courts must consider ‘whether any evidence at all’ supports hearing committee decision) (quoting Willis v. Ciccone, 506 F,2d 1011, 1019 n. 11 (8th Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
green
Vogelsang v. Coombe (1984)
We have heretofore concluded that a statement from a witness with direct knowledge of the incident involved, without more, is sufficient to support a prison disciplinary decision (Matter of Garcia v LeFevre, 102 AD2d 1004 ; see, also, Smith v Rabalais, 659 F2d 539, 546, cert den 455 US 992 ).
Accord Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. *202 denied, 455 U.S. 992 (1982); Wilwording v. Swenson, 502 F.2d 844, 851 (8th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 912 (1975).
green
Baird v. State (1982)
Compare Townsend v. State, (1981) Ind.App., 418 N.E.2d 554, 558 , cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) with Harrington v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 413 N.E.2d 622, 625 (pre-code decision).