How cited: McCloud v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. · Go Syfert

McCloud v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (1983)

green · 204 citation events across 43 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
They are, however, nothing more than procedural prerequisites to the court’s determination of the substantive issues.” Id. at 524 ; see also Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, 674 F.2d 379, 383-84 (5th Cir.1982). 18 Similarly, in Pin kard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983), we applied Zipes to hold under section 706(f)(1), that “the receipt of a right-to-sue letter is not a jurisdicti…
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, a Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); DeMatteis v. Eastman Kodak Co., 511 F.2d 306 (2d Cir.1975); Price v. Federal Express Corp., 660 F.Supp. 1388 (D.Colo.1987); Perry v. Manocherian, 675 F.Supp. 1417 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Ragheb v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich., 467 F.Supp. 94 (E.D.Mich.1979); Liotta v. National Forge Co., 473 F.Supp. 1139 (W.D.Pa.1979), aff’…
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (11th Cir.1982) ("the receipt of a right-to-sue letter subsequent to the commencement of a Title VII action, but while the action remains pending, satisfies the precondition that a plaintiff obtain statutory notice of the right to sue before filing a civil action"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (11th Cir.1982) (“the receipt of a right-to-sue letter subsequent to the commencement of a Title VII action, but while the action remains pending, satisfies the precondition that a plaintiff obtain statutory notice of the right to sue before filing a civil action"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, a Division of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211, 1216-17 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, —U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); accord Fouche v. Jekyll Island-State Park Auth., 713 F.2d 1518, 1525 (11th Cir.1982); Perdue v. Roy Stone Transfer Corp., 690 F.2d 1091, 1093 (4th Cir.1982); Watson v. Fuller Brush Co., 570 F.Supp. 1299 (W.D.Mich.1983); Black v. Brown Univ., 555 F.Supp. 880, 884 (D.R.I.1983).
green State v. Hicks (1984)
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
State v. Rachal, 428 So.2d 805 (La.1983); State v. Jones, supra; State v. Grey, 408 So.2d 1239 (La.1982); State v. Bing, 410 So.2d 227 (La.1982); compare, State v. Fergus, 418 So.2d 594 (La.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
green Elliott v. Elliott (1996)
Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see
Jenks v. Jenks, 385 S.W.2d 370, 380 (Mo.App.1964); see Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983).
Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Pinhard, v. Pullman-Standard, Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983) (right-to-sue letter as precondition to filing Title VII suit satisfied by receipt of letter while action still pending); Hladki v. Jeffrey’s Consol., Ltd., 652 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y.1987) (dismissing action under Rule 9(c) for failure to plead or aver compliance with a condition precedent when plaintiff brought Titl…
right-to-sue letter as precondition to filing Title VII suit satisfied by receipt of letter while action still pending
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211, 1215 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that a right-to-sue letter is not a jurisdictional requirement but rather a condition precedent, which can be fulfilled after filing suit), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
green May v. May (1990)
Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See, Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315-16 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983).
green Graf v. Bacon (1990)
Cited (see also) · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see also
It is no valid objection to the child support provisions of a dissolution decree that it may “require payments by the supporting parent to third parties such as schools, camps, or health care providers.” Niederkorn v. Niederkorn, 616 S.W.2d 529, 539 (Mo.App.1981); see also Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983); Biggs v. Biggs, 397 S.W.2d 337, 342-43 (Mo.App.1965).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 , 1229 n. 15 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
Cited (see also) · W.D. Okla. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); Jackson v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 678 F.2d 992 (11th Cir.1982). *190 Accordingly, the Plaintiffs action is dismissed in its entirety.
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1215-19 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983) ; Gordon v. National Youth Work Alliance, 675 F.2d 356, 359-60 (D.C.Cir. 1982); Thomas v. KATV Channel 7, 692 F.2d 548 , 549 n. 2 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1431 , 75 L.Ed.2d 790 (1983).