How cited: Traylor v. L. B. Smith, Inc. · Go Syfert

Traylor v. L. B. Smith, Inc. (1984)

green · 64 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Id. at 189.
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.) (“‘The authority to grant a new trial ... is confided almost entirely to the exercise of discretion on the part of the trial court,’ and will only be disturbed if the district court abused that discretion.”) (quoting Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 36 , 101 S.Ct. 188, 191 , 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
(The district court properly refused to allow plaintiff's expert to present precise market share figures because that expert based his opinion significantly upon a few unmemorialized telephone calls, and estimated the reliability of his model as between “1 percent and 99 percent,” Fed.R.Evid. 403; see, e.g., American Bearing Company, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163 (E.D.Pa. *491 1982), aff'd, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 1
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd on other grounds, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Lithuanian Commerce Corp. Ltd. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 179 F.R.D. 450 (D.N.J.1998)(assumptions of a certified public accountant with several advanced degrees). 18 .
Cited (see also) · D.N.J. · signal: see also
See generally ADVO, Inc., 136 F.3d at 1143 (affirming exclusion of expert report on lost profits from joint business venture based on the report’s unsupported assumptions regarding, inter alia, the product’s penetration into new markets); see also American Bearing Co., Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982) (granting new trial where testimony of damages expert should have been excluded because expert’s “estimated market shares were based on his…
Cited (see also) · D.V.I. · signal: see also
Ed. 2d 193 , 101 S. Ct. 188 (1980); see also American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., Inc., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.) (referring to trial court's discretionary power to grant new trial), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 83 L.
Cited · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
Cited · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 943, 949 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
See, e.g., Meller v. Heil Co., 745 F.2d 1297 (10th Cir.1984) (no error to exclude evidence that plaintiff who was crushed in an accident stored hashish pipes in the vehicle; low probative value); see also American Bearing Co., Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 943 , 950 n. 14 (3d Cir.) (“[a]s the district court correctly found, the speculation and unfounded assumptions underlying [the expert’s] testimony decreased its probative value, perhaps to the level of the goss…