How cited: George v. Connecticut · Go Syfert

George v. Connecticut (1985)

green · 362 citation events across 66 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
But see Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 820, 821 (N.D.Cal.1982) (awarding without discussion interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 on interest accruing on or after October 1, 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); cf. R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F.2d 1225 , 1235 (8th Cir.), (awarding interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before Oct…
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
But see Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 820, 821 (N.D.Cal.1982) (awarding without discussion interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 on interest accruing on or after October 1, 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); cf R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F.2d 1225 , 1235 (8th Cir.), (awarding interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before Octo…
Quote Authority · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See 739 F.2d 671 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985) (“Home Placement II”); 682 F.2d 274 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1028 , 103 S.Ct. 1279 , 75 L.Ed.2d 500 (1983) (“Home Placement I”); 573 F.Supp. 1423 (D.R.I.1983).
“Home Placement II”
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See generally also Canipe v. National Loss Control Service Corp., 736 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1984) (reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a negligence action brought (under Tennessee law) by an injured machine operator against the corporation which had contracted with the machine operator's employer to provide safety inspections and related accident-prevention services at the plant where the machine operator worked, because, inter alia, of…
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally also Canipe v. National Loss Control Service Corp., 736 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1984) (reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a negligence action brought (under Tennessee law) by an injured machine operator against the corporation which had contracted with the machine operator's employer to provide safety inspections and related accident-prevention services at the plant where the machine operator worked, because, inter alia, of…
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Home Placement Service, Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 739 F.2d 671 (1st Cir.1984) (judge's relationship with Senator who was responsible for his appointment did not necessitate disqualification in case involving Senator's former law firm and Senator's cousin), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985); Warner v. Global Natural Resources, 545 F.Supp. 1298 (S.D.Ohio 1982) (judge not disqualified where plaintiff was an acquaintance who had suppor…
judge not disqualified where plaintiff was an acquaintance who had supported his nomination to federal bench
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Home Placement Service, Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 739 F.2d 671 (1st Cir.1984) (judge’s relationship with Senator who was responsible for his appointment did not necessitate disqualification in case involving Senator’s former law firm and Senator’s cousin), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985); Warner v. Global Natural Resources, 545 F.Supp. 1298 (S.D.Ohio 1982) (judge not disqualified where plaintiff was an acquaintance who had suppo…
judge not disqualified where plaintiff was an acquaintance who had supported his nomination to federal bench
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Home Placement Service v. Providence Journal Co., 739 F.2d 671, 675 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 (1985).
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Home Placement Serv., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 739 F.2d 671, 675 (1st Cir.1984) (describing § 455(a) test as whether a reasonable person, “were he to know all the circumstances, would harbor doubts about the judge’s impartiality”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985); see also Ricci v. Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc., 111 F.R.D. 369, 373-75 (D.Me.1986) (Aldrich, J.) (discussing appropriate level of knowledge to impute…
green El Fenix v. The M (1994)
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Home ___ ____ Placement Serv., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 739 F.2d 671 , ______________________ _______________________ 675 (1st Cir. 1984) (describing 455(a) test as whether a reasonable person, "were he to know all the circumstances, would ____ __ __ ____ ___ ___ _____________ harbor doubts about the judge's impartiality") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 (1985); see also Ricci v. Key Bancsh- _____ ______ ___ ____ _____ ___________ ares of Maine, Inc.…
Ald- ____________________ rich, J.
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Canipe v. National Loss Control Service Corp., 736 F.2d 1055, 1063 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 965 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Canipe v. National Loss Control Service Corp., 736 F.2d 1055, 1063 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 965 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: accord
The Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, addressing factually similar situations, have held that a federal contracting officer’s failure to comply with the Miller Act’s bond approval provision “can have no counterpart in private activity” and “does not create liability on the part of the government under the [FTCA].” Devlin Lumber & Supply Corp. v. United States, 488 F.2d 88, 89 (4th Cir.1973) (Devlin); accord Arvanis v. Noslo Eng’g Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287 , …
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Precision Air Parts, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 736 F.2d 1499, 1503 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 966 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (1985); Southern Pac.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 , 1300 n. 28 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 , 1300 n. 28 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985). 34 Nevertheless, we have recognized that even where a claim is based on an unliquidated sum, courts have permitted in proper cases the recovery of prejudgment interest as a method of making a plaintiff whole.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1295 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Ostrofe v. H.S.
green Underhill v. Royal (1985)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1288 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1288 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1298 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985). 1 State law governs the interest rate on a judgment in a diversity case entered before October 1, 1982. 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (1976); Turner v. Japan Lines, Ltd., 702 F.2d 752, 757 (9th cir.1983); Michael-Regan Co. v. Lindell, 527 F.2d 653 , 659 (9th Cir.1975).
green State v. Gibson (2021)
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
The common law of this state has, to that end, ‘‘consistently recognized the right of an accused, during cross-examination, to place before the jury the fact that criminal charges are pending against the state’s wit- nesses.’’ State v. Ortiz, 198 Conn. 220, 223 , 502 A.2d 400 (1985); see State v. Benedict, 313 Conn. 494 , 510, 98 A.3d 42 (2014) (‘‘[i]t is well settled law that [t]he fact that the witness is a defendant in a criminal prosecution . . . cre- ates an interest wh…
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green State v. IBAN C. (2005)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green State v. Swinton (2004)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 366 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984) (trial court’s “isolated ruling does not in the context of the whole case amount to a deprivation of the opportunity to reveal the facts from which the jury could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green State v. Hauge (2003)
Cited · Haw. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Handguards, [ Handgards ] Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
green State v. Streater (1994)
Cited (see also) · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
“Our cases have consistently recognized the right of an accused, during cross-examination, to place before the jury the fact that criminal charges are pending against the state’s witnesses.” State v. Ortiz, 198 Conn. 220, 223 , 502 A.2d 400 (1985); State v. Lubesky, supra, 482 ; see also State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 365 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
Cited · Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
“The general standard for admissibility of expert testimony in Connecticut is simply that the expert must demonstrate a ‘special skill or knowledge, beyond the ken of the average juror, that, as properly applied, would be helpful to the determination of an ultimate issue.’ Siladi v. McNamara, 164 Conn. 510, 513 , 325 A.2d 277 (1973); see State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green State v. Headley (1991)
Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Id., 702 ; see State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green Davis v. Margolis (1990)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Fitzmaurice v. Flynn, 167 Conn. 609, 617 , 356 A.2d 887 (1975); Decho v. Shutkin, 144 Conn. 102, 106 , 127 A.2d 618 (1956); Bent v. Green, supra. The general standard for admissibility of expert testimony in Connecticut is simply that the expert must demonstrate “a special skill or knowledge, beyond the ken of the average juror, that, as properly applied, would be helpful to the determination of an ultimate issue.” Siladi v. McNamara, 164 Conn. 510, 513 , 325 A.2d 277 (1973)…
Cited · Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 372 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
Cited · D.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O.
green State v. Joseph (2009)
Cited (see also) · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see also
See, e.g., State v. Rudd, supra, 706-707 ; see also State v. Jacobs, 194 Conn. 119, 128 , 479 A.2d 226 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
green State v. Wilcox (2000)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see
State v. White, 229 Conn. 125, 134-35 , 640 A.2d 572 (1994); Demers v. State, 209 Conn. 143, 150 , 547 A.2d 28 (1988).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Esposito, 235 Conn. 802, 813-15 , 670 A.2d 301 (1996); see State v. Green, 194 Conn. 258, 263 , 480 A.2d 526 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 964 , 83 L.
green State v. Hannon (2000)
Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see
See State v. Jacobs, 194 Conn. 119, 125-26 , 479 A.2d 226 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
Cited · D.P.R. · signal: see
See Paul N. Howard Co. v. PRASA, 744 F.2d 880, 886 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 965 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (waiver found where defendant made an appearance and filed a *301 counterclaim and third-party complaint in federal court); Newfield House, Inc. v. Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare, 651 F.2d 32 , 36 n. 3 (1st Cir.1981) (waiver found where defendant sought removal, argued Eleventh Amendment did not bar federal jurisdiction, and filed a coun…
green State v. Gainer (1999)
Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see
See State v. Green, 194 Conn. 258, 266 , 480 A.2d 526 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 964 , 83 L.
green State v. Nosik (1998)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see
See State v. Green, 194 Conn. 258, 273 , 480 A.2d 526 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 964 , 83 L.
Cited · D. Mass. · signal: see
See Paul N. Howard Co. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct Sewer Auth., 744 F.2d 880, 886 (1st Cir.1984) (citing Pennhurst State School & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 , 104 S.Ct. 900 , 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 965 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (1985).
Cited · S.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Vazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County, 968 F.2d 1101, 1107 (11th Cir.1992) (citing Precision Air Parts v. Avco Corp., 736 F.2d 1499, 1501 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 966 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (1985)).
green Aga v. Hundahl (1995)
Cited · Haw. · signal: see
See Handguards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d-1282, 1293 (9th Cir.1984) [“Handgards II”], cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Wahl v. Rexnord, Inc., 481 F.Supp. 573, 588-89 (D.N.J.1979), rev’d on other grounds, 624 F.2d 1169 (3rd Cir. 1980); Prelin Indus., Inc. v. G & G Crafts, Inc., 357 F.Supp. 52, 70 (W.D.Okla.1972).
Cited · M.D. Ala. · signal: see
See Precision Air Parts, Inc. v. Avco Corp., 736 F.2d 1499, 1503 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 966 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (1985).
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287, 1290 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985); McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 548 F.2d 689, 693-94 (7th Cir.1977) (“McDaniel II’), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1033 , 98 S.Ct. 765 , 54 L.Ed.2d 780 (1978) (adopting reasoning of McDaniel v. University of Chicago, 512 F.2d 583, 585-86 (7th Cir.) (“McDaniel I”), vacated & remanded, 423 U.S. 810 , 96 S.Ct. 20 , 46 L.Ed.2d 3
Cited · N.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985) (section 1331 alone does not waive sovereign immunity); Geurkink Farms, Inc. v. United States, 452 F.2d 643 (7th Cir.1971) (section 1340 is not a waiver of governmental immunity from suit or a consent to be sued); Purk v. United States, 747 F.Supp. 1243 (S.D.Ohio 1989) (section 7804(b) does not provide an independent basis for…
section 1331 alone does not waive sovereign immunity
green State v. Turner (1991)
Cited · Conn. App. Ct. · signal: see
See State v. Green, 194 Conn. 258, 273 , 480 A.2d 526 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 964 , 83 L.
green Boyd v. Angarone (1990)
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Gero v. Henault, 740 F.2d 78, 84-85 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 965 , 83 L.Ed.2d 970 (1985) (where there is probable cause for arrest, the only question is whether it was reasonable for the arresting officers to believe that the person arrested was the one sought).
where there is probable cause for arrest, the only question is whether it was reasonable for the arresting officers to believe that the person arrested was the one sought
green State v. Williams (1987)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see
See State v. Couture, 194 Conn. 530 , 482 A.2d 300 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 967 , 83 L.
Cited · signal: see
Thus, notwithstanding any circumstances in which state law would hold a private person liable for his acts, if those circumstances are in any material respect not "like" those in which the government's act occurred, there has been no FTCA waiver of sovereign immunity. 14 Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 73-74 (2d Cir.1984); see Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969
Cited · signal: see
Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 73-74 (2d Cir.1984); see Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985).
green State v. Amarillo (1986)
Cited · Conn. · signal: see
Cir. 1966); see State v. Green, 194 Conn. 258, 265 , 480 A.2d 526 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 964 , 83 L.