Darling v. United States (1985)

green · 82 citation events across 24 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198720062026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Evans H. Starke, Jr. (1995)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also

United States v. Dorri, 15 F.3d 888, 891 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 521 , 130 L.Ed.2d 426 (1994); United States v. Oakie, 12 F.3d 1436, 1442 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 879-880 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985).

green United States v. Ricardo Elias Camargo-Vergara, Antonieta Maria Sanchez, Santos Efrain Dominguez (1995)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 881 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985).

green United States v. Bush (1994)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 881 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985). 5 Under the applicable legal standards, we conclude that the jury's finding of guilt is supported by sufficient evidence.

green United States v. Bush (1994)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 881 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985).

green United States v. Robert O. Harmas (1992)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also

See also United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 879 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985) (defense counsel’s reliance on co-counsel’s objections and statement: “My objections have all been stated, Your Honor,” did not comply with requirement of Fed.R.Crim.P. 30 that party state distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds for his objection).

green United States v. Antonio Ruben Inigo, United States of America v. Raul Armando Giordano, United States of Ame… (1991)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 883 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985).

green United States v. Frederick Ballenger (1990)

Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Meeser, 762 F.2d 867, 877 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 1024 (1985); accord United States v. United States Gypsum Co, 333 U.S. 364, 393 (1948). 41 Given the lack of any real deficiency in the evidence, this court is bound by the credibility choices of the jury.

green United States v. Marvin Goldberg (1988)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., United States v. Darling, 766 F.2d 1095 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).

green United States v. Lynne Simon, Jean Martinez, Marilyn Jacobs, and Carol Lindenberg (1988)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also

See Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b); see also United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 883 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985); United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 857 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985); United States v. Zielie, 734 F.2d 1447, 1463 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1189 , 105 S.Ct. 957 , 83 L.Ed.2d 964 (1985).

green United States v. Sandra Hernandez, A/K/A \Cha Cha (1991)

Cited · signal: see

See United States v. Meester, 762 F.2d 867, 884 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985) (jury deliberations of nine hours indicated no prejudice).

jury deliberations of nine hours indicated no prejudice

green Hall v. United States (1988)

Cited · D.C. · signal: see

See Lewis v. United States, 771 F.2d 454, 456 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985). “[I]t is clear that the government did not intentionally withhold from [defense counsel] the identities]” of its rebuttal witnesses.