How cited: Looart Press, Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization · Go Syfert

Looart Press, Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization (1987)

green · 40 citation events across 18 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Quote Authority · N.D. Fla.
Employees' Retirement Plan, 869 F.2d 1215 , 1221 (9th Cir.1988) (committee adopted policy which applied to provision which was already part of benefit plan); Dooley v. American Airlines, Inc., 797 F.2d 1447, 1452 (7th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (“[W]e are unwilling to contort the plain meaning of 'amendment' so that it includes the valid exercise of a provision which was already firmly ensconced in the pension document”); …
“[W]e are unwilling to contort the plain meaning of 'amendment' so that it includes the valid exercise of a provision which was already firmly ensconced in the pension document”
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Dooley v. American Airlines, 797 F.2d 1447 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Dooley v. American Airlines, 797 F.2d 1447 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 260-66 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1050-54 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1977); See Alexander v. City of Menlo Park, 787 F.2d 1371, 1375 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
green Sample v. Diecks (1989)
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (within trial judge’s discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359, 369-70 (4th Cir.1986) (trial court's “broad discretion” not abused where court refused to allow witness to testify when witness was disclosed to opposing counsel only two days before tri…
within trial judge’s discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order
green Sample v. Diecks (1989)
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (within trial judge's discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359, 369-70 (4th Cir.1986) (trial court's "broad discretion" not abused where court refused to allow witness to testify when witness was disclosed to opposing counsel only two days before tri…
within trial judge's discretion to exclude from trial matters not raised in pretrial order
green Brady v. Gebbie (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Alexander v. City of Menlo Park, 787 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) (“bumping” rights of employees are a constitutionally protected property interest).
“bumping” rights of employees are a constitutionally protected property interest
green Brady v. Gebbie (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Alexander v. City of Menlo Park, 787 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987) ("bumping" rights of employees are a constitutionally protected property interest).
"bumping" rights of employees are a constitutionally protected property interest
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Alexander v. City of Menlo Park, 787 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1986) (risk of error is high when the government decides a factual issue without allowing the individual affected to participate), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987).
Cited (see also) · W.D. Pa. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Randolph County v. Alabama Power Co., 784 F.2d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 878 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 (1987); Adalman v. Baker, Watts & Co., 807 F.2d 359 , 369–70 (4th Cir.1986).3 The purposes behind Rule 16 and the myriad local rules governing the narrowing of issues for trial, see, e.g., Rule 5, Local Rules of the Western District of Pennsylvania (evidence not disclosed in pretrial narratives generally not admissible at trial), …
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Dooley v. American Airlines, Inc., 797 F.2d 1447, 1453-54 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 879 , 93 L.Ed.2d 833 and 479 U.S. 1087 , 107 S.Ct. 1292 , 94 L.Ed.2d 149 (1987).