How cited: Knuckles v. Ohio · Go Syfert

Knuckles v. Ohio (1987)

green · 21 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987); Rush v. United States, 795 F.2d 638, 639-40 (8th Cir.1986).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 465 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 465 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987); United States v. Purham, 725 F.2d 450, 454 (8th Cir.1984).
green Perry v. Lockhart (1989)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 465 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987); United States v. Purham, 725 F.2d 450, 454 (8th Cir.1984).
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461 (8th Cir.) (finding no abuse of discretion in decision to exclude expert testimony where Government’s case relied on more than only the eyewitness identification), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987); United States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308 (finding no abuse of discretion in decision to exclude expert testimony where eyewitness identification only a small part of Government’s case but noting that admission …
green Stead v. United States (1999)
Cited · D.S.D. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461, 464-65 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987).
Cited · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Blade, 811 F.2d 461 (8th Cir.) (finding no abuse of discretion in decision to exclude expert testimony where Government’s case relied on more than only the eyewitness identification), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 839 , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed.2d 82 (1987); United States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308 (finding no abuse of discretion in decision to exclude expert testimony where eyewitness identification only a small part of Government’s case but noting that admission …
green State v. Gunter (1989)
Cited · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see
See U.S. v. Blade, 811 F. 2d 461 (8th Cir.1987), cert. den. 484 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 124 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 82 (1987); U.S. v. Moore, 786 F. 2d 1308 (5th Cir.1986); U.S. v. Langford, 802 F. 2d 1176 (9th Cir.1986), cert. den. 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed. 2d 740 (1987); U.S. v. Poole, 794 F. 2d 462 (9th Cir.1986); U.S. v. Christophe, 833 F. 2d 1296 (9th Cir.1987).