How cited: Williams v. Hevi-Duty Electric Co. · Go Syfert

Williams v. Hevi-Duty Electric Co. (1987)

green · 225 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Quote Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
Frisby, 487 U.S. at 484, 486 , 101 L.Ed.2d at 431, 433 . *30 See generally State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987) (“The sanctity of the home is a revered tenet of Anglo-American jurisprudence.
“The sanctity of the home is a revered tenet of Anglo-American jurisprudence. The law recognizes the special status of the home .... And the law has consistently acknowledged the expectation of and right to privacy within the home”
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Carter v. State, 717 S.W.2d 60, 62-66 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cer t. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 407 (1987). 2 .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Carter v. State, 717 S.W.2d 60, 62-66 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 407 (1987). 2 .
green State v. Smith (2005)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Adams, 347 N.C. 48, 77 , 490 S.E.2d 220, 236 (1997) (noting that "[a] murder in the home `shocks the conscience, not only because a life was senselessly taken, but because it was taken [at] an especially private place, one [where] a person has a right to feel secure'") (alterations in original) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1096 , 118 S.C…
green Anderson v. Assimos (2001)
Cited (see also) · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Elam, 302 N.C. 157, 161 , 273 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1981); see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 211 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 22 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green Jones v. State (1995)
Cited (see also) · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also James v. State, 736 P.2d 541 (Okl.Cr. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987); Van-Woundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328 (Okl.
green Hammon v. State (1995)
Cited (see also) · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also James v. State, 736 P.2d 541 (Okl.Cr.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987); VanWoundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328 (Okl.Cr.1986), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 956 , 107 S.Ct. 447 , 93 L.Ed.2d 395 (1986); on post-conviction, affirmed, unpublished, PC-87-633; ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1036 , 108 S.Ct. 763 , 98 L.Ed.2d 780 (1988).
green State v. Harris (1994)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Bacon (1994)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 198-99 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 15 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green People v. White (1994)
Cited · Colo. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Childs v. State, 257 Ga. 243 , 357 S.E.2d 48, 61 , ceH. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987); Stephens, 247 S.E.2d at 97 ; Templeman, 785 S.W.2d at 260 ; Biegenwald, 542 A.2d at 446-47 .
green Neill v. State (1992)
Cited (see also) · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also James v. State, 736 P.2d 541 (Okl.Cr. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987); Van Woundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328 (Okl.Cr. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 956 , 107 S.Ct. 447 , 93 L.Ed.2d 395 (1986); on post-conviction, affirmed, unpublished, PC-87-633; cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1036 , 108 S.Ct. 763 , 98 L.Ed.2d 780 (1988).
green Lafevers v. State (1991)
Cited · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See James v. State, 736 P.2d 541, 543 (Okl.Cr. 1987) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987); VanWoundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328 (Okl.Cr. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 956 , 107 S.Ct. 447 , 93 L.Ed.2d 395 (1986); Master v. State, 702 P.2d at 375 ; Cooks v. State, 699 P.2d 653 (Okl.Cr. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 935 , 106 S.Ct. 268 , 88 L.Ed.2d 275 (1985).
green James v. State (1991)
Cited · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See James v. Oklahoma, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987).
green State v. Huff (1989)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E. 2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987) (this aggravating circumstance supported death sentence where victim shot in his home); State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465 , 356 S.E. 2d 279 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 226 (1987) (multiple killings); State v. Taylor, 304 N.C. 249 , 283 S.E. 2d 761 (1981), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1213 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 1398 , reh’g denied, 463 U.S. 1249 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 1456 (1983) (fema…
this aggravating circumstance supported death sentence where victim shot in his home
green State v. McNeill (2018)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also
See State v. Taylor , 337 N.C. 597 , 613, 447 S.E.2d 360 , 370 (1994) 14 ("It is well established that although the defendant's failure to take the stand and deny the charges against him may not be the subject of comment, the defendant's failure to produce exculpatory evidence or to contradict evidence presented by the State may properly be brought to the jury's attention by the State in its closing argument." (first citing State v. Reid , 334 N.C. 551 , 555, 434 S.E.2d 193
green State v. Waring (2010)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Allen (2006)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 199 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 15 (discussing how “evidence is not only what [jurors] hear on the stand but what they witness in the courtroom.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 (1987).
green State v. Smith (2005)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see
See State v. Adams, 347 N.C. 48 , 77, 490 S.E.2d 220 , 236 (1997) (noting that "[a] murder in the home 'shocks the conscience, not only because a life was senselessly taken, but because it was taken [at] an especially private place, one [where] a person has a right to feel secure'") (alterations in original) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 231, 358 S.E.2d 1 , 34, cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Lloyd (2001)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also
We have held that “[t]o suggest that the jury is effectively an arm of the State in the prosecution of the defendant or that the jury is the last link in the State’s chain of law enforcement is improper.” State v. Elliott, 344 N.C. at 285, 475 S.E.2d at 222-23 (trial court not required to intervene ex mero mo tu when defendant failed to object to argument that jury was last link in the State’s chain of law enforcement); see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 203 , 358 S.E.2d…
green State v. Salmon (2000)
Cited (see also) · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 195 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 13 (holding that the prosecutor’s remark “when a deadly weapon is used in certain ways and fashions, it gives rise to the crime of murder in the first degree” was “so general as to be unobjectionable.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Cummings (2000)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also
Williams, 350 N.C. at 26-27 , 510 S.E.2d at 643 ; see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 206 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 19 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Smith (1999)
Cited · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 199 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 15 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Murillo (1998)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Woods (1997)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 202-03 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 13 (prosecutor’s argument that jury should find defendant guilty in order to grant justice to the victim’s family not reversible error), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Rouse (1994)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also
See also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 206 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 19 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
no gross impropriety in prosecutor’s statement that victim was denied opportunity to “get right with the Lord”
green Bland v. State (1994)
Cited · Ga. · signal: see
See Childs v. State, 257 Ga. 243, 245 ( 357 SE2d 48 ) (evidence of escape while being held on murder charge would have been admissible in trial of murder charge if charges had been severed), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 970 (1987); Renner v. State, 260 Ga. 515 ( 397 SE2d 683 ) (1990) (prosecution may offer and argue evidence of flight as demonstrating consciousness of guilt); Welborn v. State, 236 Ga. 319 ( 223 SE2d 698 ) (1976) (during trial on robbery charge, not error to infor…
green Low v. Hasbro, Inc. (1993)
Cited · D.R.I. · signal: see
See *251 Williams v. Hevi-Duty Electric Co., 668 F.Supp. 1062, 1070 (M.D.Tenn.1986), rev’d on other grounds, 819 F.2d 620 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987) (construing parallel provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e).
construing parallel provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
green State v. Baldwin (1992)
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also
Ed. 2d 155 (1990); see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.
green State v. Laws (1989)
Cited · N.C. · signal: see
See State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 108 S.Ct. 467 , 98 L.Ed.2d 406 (1987) (reference to the rights of the victim's family during the prosecutor's sentencing argument did not violate Booth).
reference to the rights of the victim's family during the prosecutor's sentencing argument did not violate Booth