How cited: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Furka · Go Syfert

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Furka (1988)

green · 144 citation events across 32 courts. Showing the 25 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Quote Authority · 9th Cir.
Ct., 825 F.2d 1416 , 1418 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988) ("When the district court's order is correct as a matter of law, it is obvious that the writ of mandamus should not be issued."). 10 In Calderon v. U.S. Dist.
"When the district court's order is correct as a matter of law, it is obvious that the writ of mandamus should not be issued."
Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Survival Systems Div. of Whittaker Corp. v. United States District Court, 825 F.2d 1416, 1418 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988) (“In this case, the order of remand did not resolve a matter of substantive law, as in Pelleport....
“In this case, the order of remand did not resolve a matter of substantive law, as in Pelleport.... The ruling of the district court was that the state cause of action alleged in [plaintiff’s] complaint was not an artfully pled federal claim that was preempted by federal labor law.”
Rule Authority · Mich.
Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454-55 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S. Ct.775, 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1455 n. 6 (9th Cir.) (quoting MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340 , 353 n. 8, 106 S.Ct. 2561, 2568 , 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986)), modified on other grounds, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Survival Systems Division of the Whittaker Corp. v. U.S. District Court, 825 F.2d 1416 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988) (discretionary remand orders generally reviewable only by petition for writ of mandamus because such orders do not finally determine a substantive legal issue under the collateral order doctrine).
discretionary remand orders generally reviewable only by petition for writ of mandamus because such orders do not finally determine a substantive legal issue under the collateral order doctrine
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Ghandi v. Police Dep’t. of Detroit, 747 F.2d 338 , 354 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1453 n. 4 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 , 1453 n. 4 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
We also noted in Unity Ventures that the Ninth Circuit, drawing upon Yolo County and Williamson County, applied the Court’s takings analysis to claims involving equal protection and substantive due process: “In Kinzli, we interpreted Williamson and MacDonald to require a final decision by the government which inflicts a concrete harm upon the plaintiff landowner.” Her rington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488 , 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (emphasis in original), ce rt. denied, — U.…
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
We also noted in Unity Ventures that the Ninth Circuit, drawing upon Yolo County and Williamson County, applied the Court's takings analysis to claims involving equal protection and substantive due process: "In Kinzli, we interpreted Williamson and MacDonald to require a final decision by the government which inflicts a concrete harm upon the plaintiff landowner." Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, --- U.S…
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
The council’s action rejecting the proposed project and limiting density to R-l, single family, constituted “a final and authoritative determination of the type and intensity of development legally permitted on the subject property.” See MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340, 348 , 106 S.Ct. 2561, 2566 , 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986); see also Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1987), amended on other grounds, 830 F.2d 968 (1987), cert. d…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). 67 In Survival Systems v. United States District Court, 825 F.2d 1416 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988), we implicitly assumed claims preempted by the NLRA are removable to federal court.
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Chula Vista City School District v. Bennett, 824 F.2d 1573, 1579 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Chula Vista City School Dist. v. Bennett, 824 F.2d 1573 , 1578-79 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988). . 28 U.S.C. § 1491 . .
green Hurd v. United States (2001)
Cited · D.S.C. · signal: see
See Furka v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 824 F.2d 330, 332 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Berg v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 759 F.2d 1425, 1430 (9th Cir.1985); Korpi v. United States, 961 F.Supp. 1335, 1347 (N.D.Cal. 1997), aff'd, 145 F.3d 1338 , 1998 WL 231207 (1998).
green Moore v. United States (1996)
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454-55 , amended, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); see also Southern Pacific Transp.
Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see
Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567 , 569 n. 1 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989); see Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1456 (9th Cir.1987), modified in other respects, 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043 , 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988) (procedural due process claim found not to be ripe because substantive due process claim was not ripe).
procedural due process claim found not to be ripe because substantive due process claim was not ripe
Cited (see also) · D. Conn. · signal: see also
Similarly, “only when [the property owner] receives a ‘ “final definitive [decision] regarding how [the local agency] will apply the regulations” ’ to [the property in issue] will the district court be able to review ‘the alleged dissimilar treatment accorded similarly situated landowners.’ ” Landmark Land Co., Inc. v. Buchanan, 874 F.2d 717 , 722 (10th Cir.1989) (quoting Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 857 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct…
Cited (see also) · E.D. Mich. · signal: see also
Watkins v. Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Assn., 630 F.2d 1155, 1158 (6th Cir.1980) (citations omitted); see also, Ghandi v. Police Dept. of the City of Detroit, 747 F.2d 338 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom., Ghandi v. Fayed, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · Ct. Cl. · signal: see
See Chula Vista City School Dist. v. Bennett, 824 F.2d 1573 , 1582 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert denied, 484 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988).
Cited · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 , Amended by 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141 , 1146 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
Cited · signal: see
See Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 , Amended by 830 F.2d 968 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141 , 1146 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see
See Chula Vista City School Dist v. Bennett, 824 F.2d 1573 , 1578-79 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed.Cir.1983). .
Cited (see also) · Ct. Cl. · signal: see also
E.g., Culebras Enter.’s Corp. v. Rivera Rios, 813 F.2d 506, 515 (1st Cir.1987); Lit- tlefield v. City of Afton, 785 F.2d 596 , 609 (8th Cir.1986); see also, e.g., Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 (9th Cir.1987) (plaintiff was generally required to seek a variance from permit denial by the city, but was not required to seek the variance where that application would be futile), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 775 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Corn v. City of Laud…
green Andrews v. Webb (1988)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Va. · signal: see also
See 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a)(2); see also Chula Vista City School Dist. v. Bennett, 824 F.2d 1573 , 1578-79 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 774 , 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed.Cir. 1983); cf. Gowar v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925 (4th Cir.1986).