Whaley v. United States (1988)
green
· 166 citation events
across 16 courts.
Showing the 44 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Stevenson v. State (2010)
But see United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 237 (1st Cir.1987) (describing bail hearings as “a fundamentally different breed of cat” from suppression hearings in that the accused’s bail rights are not so contingent on his ability to speak without fear of the future use of his testimony that he must be granted a blanket immunity from use of all statements made during an initial hearing, particularly as the information may in large part be concerned with the accused’s emp…
green
United States v. Trenkler (1995)
Id. at 231.
green
State v. Moeller (1996)
See also U.S. v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 237 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988) ("Because the unknown in the case was whether X = Ingraham, the probative worth of this [prior bad acts] evidence far outstripped any unfairly prejudicial effect.") (emphasis in original). [¶ 181] Given the finding of need for this information, the trial court proceeded to do everything it could to avoid any unfair prejudice.
"Because the unknown in the case was whether X = Ingraham, the probative worth of this [prior bad acts] evidence far outstripped any unfairly prejudicial effect."
green
United States v. Francisco Nolasco (1991)
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 646 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433, 442-43 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); Murphy v. Holland, 776 F.2d 470, 475 (4th Cir.1985) (term has “self-evident meaning comprehensible to the lay juror”), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1138 , 106 S.Ct. 1787 , 90 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986).
green
United States v. Francis E. Devin (1990)
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 649 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
green
United States v. Thomas Johnston (1989)
See United States v. Angulo, 864 F.2d 504, 508 (7th Cir.1988) (quoting United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988)); United States v. Moya, 721 F.2d 606, 610 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984).
green
United States v. Velazquez Rotger (1995)
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 ___ ____ _____________ ________ F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , _____ ______ 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Rodriguez Pena (1995)
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. DeMasi (1994)
As we have noted before, “[i]n the last analysis, criminal juries are not expected to ignore what is perfectly obvious.” Echeverri, 982 F.2d at 679 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 10 DeMasi, Martel, and Papa’s sufficiency challenges need detain us only briefly.
green
United States v. De Masi (1994)
As we have noted before, "[i]n the last analysis, criminal juries are not expected to ignore what is perfectly obvious." Echeverri, 982 F.2d at 679 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 10 32 DeMasi, Martel, and Papa's sufficiency challenges need detain us only briefly.
green
United States v. Jesus Rosalez-Cortez (1994)
We may overturn a verdict “[o]nly when the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Teague, 956 F.2d 1427, 1433 (7th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d. 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Vavlitis (1993)
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Marco A. Echeverri (1993)
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 236 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988) (authentication of telephone call and anonymous letters based on caller-author’s “peculiar obsession with [and approach to] the same obscure litigation,” amounting to an idiosyncratic “signature”); see also United *672 States v. McMahon, 938 F.2d 1501, 1508-09 (1st Cir.1991) (authentication of unsigned note based on circumstantial indicia of …
authentication of telephone call and anonymous letters based on caller-author’s “peculiar obsession with [and approach to] the same obscure litigation,” amounting to an idiosyncratic “signature”
green
United States v. Arthur Sutton (1992)
See Fed.R.Evid. 614(b) (authorizing trial judge to interrogate witnesses); see also United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 648 (1st Cir.1987) (discussing extent of district court’s discretion to question a witness in a criminal jury trial), cert, denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
See generally United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987) (“The law is not so struthious as to compel a criminal jury to ignore that which is perfectly obvious.”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Feli… (1992)
See Vargas, 945 F.2d at 429 ; Smith, 680 F.2d at 260 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987) (“The law is not so struthious as to compel a criminal jury to ignore that which is perfectly obvious.”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Shmuel David, United States of America v. Jaime Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v… (1991)
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
green
United States v. William Cherry (1991)
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987) ("The reviewing court will examine only those contentions that are based on newly raised questions of law, untainted by factual ambiguity.”’) (quoting United States v. McCabe, 720 F.2d 951, 955 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 14 .
green
United States v. David (1991)
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
green
Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Frg Ventures, Inc., Veranda Beach Club Limited … (1991)
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 24 Mongillo also urges that the evidence's probative value was overwhelmed by its unduly prejudicial effect.
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
Noel O. Murchu, A/K/A Noel Murphy v. United States (1991)
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 648 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
“Only if serious injustice was inflicted upon a defendant, or if he was convicted in a manner inconsistent with fairness and integrity of judicial proceedings, will we exercise our power under the plain error rule.” United States v. Bryant, 480 F.2d 785 , 790 n. 3 (2d Cir.1973) (citing United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160 , 56 S.Ct. 391, 392 , 80 L.Ed. 555 (1936)); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987) (“plain error is an error resultin…
green
United States v. Billy Ray McDowell Jr. (1990)
See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (articulating standard); see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 239-40 (1st Cir.1987) (evidence need not preclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence so long as “a rational jury could look objectively at the proof and supportably conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant’s guilt had been established”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , …
green
United States v. Sam Paiz, Douglas Rector, Dick Selby, Leann Cooper, Joe Rector, Barbara Allen, and Tim Rector (1990)
They assert that our review *1019 of its decision should turn on the following question: “Did the evidence at trial show the occurrence of one overall conspiracy, as charged in the indictment, or the occurrence of multiple, narrower, conspiracies?” If we were to tackle this question we would start with the definition of conspiracy: A conspiracy is “a combination or confederation between two or more people formed for the purpose of committing by their joint efforts, a crimina…
green
United States v. Isaac Dweck (1990)
“A court reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence must uphold a conviction if, ‘after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” United States v. Hammond, 826 F.2d 577, 579 (7th Cir.1987) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original)); see also United States v. Whaley, 8…
green
United States v. Fausto D. Ruiz (1990)
See, e.g., United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Ronald William Pelton, United States of America v. Ronald William Pelton (1990)
See United States v. Pelton, 835 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3789 (U.S. May 16, 1988) (No. 87-6433).
No. 87-6433
green
United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino (1990)
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
green
United States v. Michael Patrick Doran (1990)
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1478-79 (7th Cir.1987) (refusing to impose presumption), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Lane, 815 F.2d at 878-79 (same); Mays, 738 F.2d at 1190 (same); United States v. Ruppel, 724 F.2d 507, 508 (5th Cir.1984) (same); United States v. Motley, 655 F.2d 186, 188-89 (9th Cir.1981); (imposing presumption); United States v. Jamison, 505 F.2d 407, 413-17 (D.C.Cir.1974) (same).
green
United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America… (1989)
See, e.g., United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
green
United States v. Glenda Blanton and Gary Cree (1989)
See, e.g., United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469 , 1472 & n. 1 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988) and cases cited therein.
green
United States v. William Gaddis and Barnetta Gaddis (1989)
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1472 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Mayo, 721 F.2d 1084, 1088 (7th Cir.1983).
green
United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United Sta… (1989)
We have previously required the common presence of "some highly distinctive quality." United States v. Pisari, 636 F.2d 855, 859 (1st Cir.1981); accord United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 232-33 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); see United States v. Lail, 846 F.2d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Neary, 733 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Silva, 580 F.2d 144, 148 (5th Cir.1978).
green
United States v. Garcia-Rosa (1989)
We have previously required the common presence of “some highly distinctive quality.” United States v. Pisan, 636 F.2d 855, 859 (1st Cir.1981); accord United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 232-33 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); see United States v. Lail, 846 F.2d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Neary, 733 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Silva, 580 F.2d 144,148 (5th Cir.1978).
green
United States v. Patrick J. Carroll (1989)
A plain error is one that results in “an actual miscarriage of justice,” United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985), such that the defendant “probably would have been acquitted but for the erroneously admitted evidence.” Wynn, 845 F.2d at 1443 ; see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United …
green
United States v. Patrick Rooney (1989)
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1475 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
green
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Mene… (1988)
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Abayomi, 820 F.2d at 906 ; Perry, 747 F.2d at 1169 ; Xheka, 704 F.2d at 988-89 ; Quintana, 508 F.2d at 880 ; United States v. Baker, 499 F.2d 845, 848 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1071 , 95 S.Ct. 659 , 42 L.Ed.2d 667 (1974).
green
State v. Smith (1999)
See also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 236-7 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). [¶ 22.] The trial court also gave the appropriate cautionary instruction setting forth the limited purpose for which the evidence was admitted.
green
State v. Chamley (1997)
See also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 237 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). [¶ 66.] There was substantial legitimate value in the 404(b) testimony to establish intent and to negate Chamley's claims that he did not commit the charged acts.
green
Butler v. United States (1994)
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 646 (1st Cir.1987) ("an instruction which uses the words reasonable doubt without further definition adequately apprises the jury of the proper burden of proof”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Murphy v. Holland, 776 F.2d 470, 475 (4th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1138 , 106 S.Ct. 1787 , 90 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986) ("To protect the accused’s due process rights and avoid sup…
green
Foreman v. United States (1993)
The judge also defined it as “such a doubt as would cause a reasonable person to hesitate or pause in the graver or more important transactions of life,” an instruction approved by the Supreme Court in Holland, 348 U.S. at 140 , 75 5.Ct. at 138; see also Bishop v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 132, 137-38 , 107 F.2d 297, 303 (1939) (citations omitted). 6 Additionally, reflecting the fact that to a large extent “[t]he term reasonable doubt ... has a self-evident meaning comprehe…