How cited: Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc. · Go Syfert

Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc. (1988)

green · 136 citation events across 37 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Rule Authority · Bankr. W.D. Mich.
Relying upon United Steel Workers of America v. Unimet Corp. (In re Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 *632 (1988) and the legislatively reversed NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1983), TCU next argues that § 1113 requires a trustee to make all payments under the collective bargaining agreement until it is rejected, notwithstanding the limitations imposed upon the paym…
Quote Authority · Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · signal: accord
Accord, In re Unimet Corp., 842 F.2d 879, 884 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988) (“Section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement.”) 21.
“Section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement.”
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Prods., 839 F.2d 1544 , 5 USPQ2d 1779 (Fed.Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988). 2.
green In Re Robertson (1993)
Cited · D.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); In re Evans, 533 A.2d 243, 244 (D.C.1987). .
Cited · D. Del. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc., 839 F.2d 1544, 1552 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); Hottel Corp. v. Seaman Corp., 833 F.2d 1570, 1572 (Fed.Cir.1987). 18 When the delay exceeds six years, the burden of rebutting the presumption shifts to the patentee who must prove (1) the existence of an excuse for the delay, and (2) that the excuse is reasonable.
Cited (see also) · Bankr. C.D. Cal. · signal: compare
Compare *362 United Steelworkers of Am. v. Unimet Corp. (In re Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879, 884 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988) (stating that § 1113 “unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement”), with Adventure Res., Inc. v. Holland, 137 F.3d 786 , 797 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that § 1113(f) does not su-percede the priorities embodied in § 507), Air Lin…
stating that § 1113 “unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement”
Cited (see also) · Bankr. W.D. Mo. · signal: see also
See N.L.R.B. v. Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 526 , 104 S.Ct. 1188, 1196 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984); See also Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust Funds for California v. Robertson (In re Rufener Construction, Inc.), 53 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that section 1113 is not applicable in a Chapter 7 proceeding). 19 . 11 U.S.C. § 365 (a). 20 . 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988). 21 .
green In Re Regent (1999)
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742 (D.C.1988) (finding disbarment appropriate where respondent failed to disclose material facts on his application for the Maryland Bar), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , *43 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); accord, In re Webster, 661 A.2d 144 (D.C.1995).
green In Re Webster (1995)
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988).
green In Re Goffe (1994)
Cited (see also) · D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.) (failure to disclose material information on Maryland Bar application warrants reciprocal disbarment where such misconduct would incur similar discipline if it occurred in the District of Columbia), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988).” Id. at 421.
green In Re Garner (1994)
Cited (see also) · D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988) (failure to disclose material information on Maryland Bar application warrants reciprocal disbarment where such misconduct would incur similar discipline if it occurred in the District of Columbia).
failure to disclose material information on Maryland Bar application warrants reciprocal disbarment where such misconduct would incur similar discipline if it occurred in the District of Columbia
green In Re Almac's Inc. (1993)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. D.R.I. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United Steelworkers v. Unimet Corp. (In Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); In re Arlene’s Sportswear, Inc., 140 B.R. 25 (Bankr.D.Mass.1992); In re Golden Distribs., Ltd., 134 B.R. 760 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1991), aff 'd 152 B.R. 35 (S.D.N.Y.1992).
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See In re Unimet Corp., 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); 130 Cong.Rec. § 8898 (daily ed June 29, 1984) (statement of Sen.
statement of Sen. Kennedy