How cited: Green v. United States · Go Syfert

Green v. United States (1989)

green · 262 citation events across 41 courts. Showing the 33 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
green Sochor v. Florida (1992)
Quote Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e. g., Wasko v. State, 505 So. 2d 1314, 1318 (Fla. 1987); Brookings v. State, 495 So. 2d 135, 142-43 (Fla. 1986); McCampbell v. State, 421 So. 2d 1072, 1075-76 (Fla. 1982); Goodwin v. State, 405 So. 2d 170, 172 (Fla. 1981); Odom v. State, 403 So. 2d 936, 942-43 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U. S. 925 . . . (1982); Neary v. State, 384 So. 2d 881, 885-88 (Fla. 1980); Malloy v. State, 382 So. 2d 1190, 1193 (Fla. 1979); Shue v. State, 366 So. 2d 387, 390-91 (Fla. 1978); Mc…
"[W]e approve the death sentence on the basis that a jury recommendation of death is entitled to great weight"
green Spisak v. Mitchell (2006)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
No. 03-4034 Spisak v. Mitchell Page 10 296 (Ohio 1969).
green Commonwealth v. Rios (1992)
Quote Authority · Mass.
See Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 338 (1970); Mann v. Dugger, 817 F.2d 1471, 1476 (11th Cir. 1987), on rehearing, 844 F.2d 1446 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989) (“the Sixth Amendment’s right to confrontation, as incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees a defendant the right to be present when a witness is testifying against him during trial”).
“the Sixth Amendment’s right to confrontation, as incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees a defendant the right to be present when a witness is testifying against him during trial”
Quote Authority · C.D. Cal.
See Boyd v. Puckett, 905 F.2d 895, 896-97 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 526 , 112 L.Ed.2d 537 (1990); Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 749 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (“a habeas petitioner must show that the prosecutor or other government officer knew the testimony in question was false in order to prevail”) (citations and quotations omitted); De Martino v. Weidenburner, 616 F.2d 708, 711 (3rd Cir.1…
“a habeas petitioner must show that the prosecutor or other government officer knew the testimony in question was false in order to prevail”
green Beuke v. Houk (2008)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Beuke v. Ohio, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1356 , 103 L.Ed.2d 823 (1989).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1451 (11th Cir.1988) (collecting additional cases), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989). 158 Thus the question before the court is whether the sentencing judge would have overridden the jury's recommendation of life if counsel had adduced the evidence now proffered establishing the three statutory mitigating circumstances, and whether the Florida Supreme Court would have vacated any such override.…
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464, 1473-74 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (Florida); see also Project, Nineteenth Annual Review of Crim.Proc.: United States Sup.Ct. and Cts. of App. 1988-89, 78 Geo.L.J. 669, 1294 n. 2747 (1990) (noting that Florida, Alabama, and Indiana use a jury recommendation system as an advisory opinion for trial judge).
Florida
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446 , 1448 n. 4 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989); Cooper v. Wainwright, 807 F.2d 881, 886-87 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1050 , 107 S.Ct. 2183 , 95 L.Ed.2d 839 (1987); Oliver v. Wainwright, 795 F.2d 1524, 1528-29 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 921 , 107 S.Ct. 1380 , 94 L.Ed.2d 694 (1987); see also Messer v. Florida, 834 F.2d 890, 892-93 (11th Cir.1987) (becau…
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
The en banc court then explained the rationale behind this test: 131 When a trial court does not correct misleading comments as to the jury's sentencing role, the state has violated the defendant's eighth amendment rights because the court has given the state's imprimatur to those comments; the effect is the same as if the trial court had actually instructed the jury that the prosecutor's comments represented a correct statement of the law.... [O]ur focus is ultimately on th…
green Beuke v. Houk (2008)
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Beuke v. Ohio, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n.2 (D.C.
listing the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits as continuing to apply Remmer
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1987) (listing the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits as continuing to apply Remmer).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1448 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989) (describing the Mississippi Supreme Court's role in capital sentencing). 6 .
describing the Mississippi Supreme Court's role in capital sentencing
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446 , 1448 n. 4 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 821 (1989).
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see also
See Fed.R.Evid. 1101(e) (Federal Rules of Evidence govern proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ); see also Stockton v. Commonwealth of Va., 852 F.2d 740, 743-44 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 744 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989); United States v. Butler, 822 F.2d 1191 , 1195 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1987).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 468-69 (6th Cir.1988) (opening the door precludes a party from complaining about the introduction of similar evidence by the opposing party), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989), and cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 469 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 and 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Weisman, 858 F.2d 389, 391 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989); United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 598 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2830 (1991); Nivica, 887 F.2d at 1121 . 4 Having broad discretion to deny hybrid representation and to circumscribe counsel's role if hybrid representation is granted, a trial court necessarily has the discretion to place restrictions on standby counsel's in-court role in cases of pure …
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Weisman, 858 F.2d 389, 391 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 467 (6th Cir.1988) (recognizing probative value of notes, receipts and telephone numbers found in co-conspirator’s apartment), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 467 (6th Cir.1988) (recognizing probative value of notes, receipts and telephone numbers found in coconspirator's apartment), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1353 , 103 L.Ed.2d 820 (1989).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a ... trial by an impartial jury ... [and to] be confronted with the witnesses against him[.]” Indeed, claims of improper juror contact touch “the core of the Sixth Amendment’s right to ... an impartial jury[.]” United States v. Day, 830 F.2d 1099, 1
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 745 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (federal *1196 habeas court properly held an evidentiary hearing since the merits of the factual dispute were not resolved in the state hearings).
federal *1196 habeas court properly held an evidentiary hearing since the merits of the factual dispute were not resolved in the state hearings
Cited · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare Williams v. Taylor, 529 U. S. 362, 390 (2000) (Stevens, J., for the Court) (applicable date for purposes of determining whether “Federal law” is “established” is when the “state-court conviction became final”), with id., at 412 (O’Connor, J., for the Court) (applicable date is “the time of the relevant state-court decision”); see State v. Spisak, 36 Ohio St. 3d 80 , 521 N. E. 2d 800 (decided Apr. 13, 1988), cert. denied, 489 U. S. 1071 (decided Mar. 6, 1989); Mills v…
green Grossman v. Crosby (2005)
Cited · M.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989), and Grossman v. Dugger, 708 So.2d 249 (Fla.1997), in which the Florida Supreme Court set out the facts of the case.
Cited (see also) · D. Colo. · signal: see also
See also, Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989) (failure to present expert testimony on intoxication in the guilt/innocence phase of murder case not likely to have affected outcome of case because evidence that defendant was suffering from alcohol idiosyncratic intoxication at the time of the crime would have implicated him in the murder in contradiction of his own testimony).
green Kearse v. State (1995)
Cited (see also) · Fla. · signal: see also
Even though Kearse may have been motivated by his desire to avoid arrest when he took the gun, the incident still constituted a robbery because it involved "the taking of ... property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear." § 812.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); see also Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988) (evidence that defendant wrestled o…
green State v. Coulter (1992)
Cited (see also) · Ohio Ct. App. · signal: see also
See, also, State v. Clark (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 252, 256 , 527 N.E.2d 844, 849 , certiorari denied (1989), 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 823 .
green Smith v. State (1992)
Cited · Fla. · signal: accord
Accord Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
green Owen v. State (1992)
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
green Klokoc v. State (1991)
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Harich v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1355 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).
green Espinosa v. State (1991)
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Grossman v. State, 525 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 , 109 S.Ct. 1354 , 103 L.Ed.2d 822 (1989).