How cited: Martin County v. Executive 100, Inc. · Go Syfert

Martin County v. Executive 100, Inc. (1991)

green · 87 citation events across 24 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1539 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 5.Ct. 55, 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1549-50 (11th Cir.) (Clark, J., dissenting), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991). 11 .
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991); Eide v. Sarasota County, 908 F.2d 716 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1120 , 111 S.Ct. 1073 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1991); see also Taylor Inv., Ltd. v. Upper Darby Township, 983 F.2d 1285 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 304 , 126 L.Ed.2d 252 (1993).
Cited · S.D. Fla. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Reahard, 30 F.3d at 1417 (citing Executive 100, Inc., v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991)) (affirming dismissal of due process takings claim and just compensation claim).
Cited (see also) · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see also
In other actions [that] are available and could provide similar relief.” words, the federal courts have reasoned that a court cannot Southern Pacific, 922 F.2d at 503; see also Executive determine whether a taking or other constitutional violation 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1541 (11th has occurred until the court can compare the uses prohibited Cir.) (aggrieved landowner must “have sought variances or by the regulation to any permissible uses that may be made…
Cited · 8th Cir. BAP · signal: see
See Jehan-Das, Inc. v. United States (In re Jehan-Das, Inc.), 925 F.2d 237, 238 (8th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991) ( holding that, if a payment is voluntary, the taxpayer can decide which of his tax liabilities to pay; otherwise the IRS directs the application of the payment); Muntwyler v. United States, 703 F.2d *91 1030, 1032 (7th Cir.1983) (accepting the IRS policy to allocate involuntary payments as it sees fit as a "sensib…
holding that, if a payment is voluntary, the taxpayer can decide which of his tax liabilities to pay; otherwise the IRS directs the application of the payment
Cited (see also) · Tex. · signal: see also
Moreover, the term “variance” is “not definitive or talismanic;” it encompasses “other types of permits or actions [that] are available and could provide similar relief.” Southern Pacific, 922 F.2d at 503; see also Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1541 (11th Cir.)(aggrieved landowner must “have sought variances or pursued alternative, less ambitious development plans”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991); Landmark Land Co. o…
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991).
Cited · S.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536, 1542 (11th Cir.1991) (district court in 1988 properly dismissed takings claim because plaintiff failed to bring inverse condemnation claim in state court to obtain just compensation), cert. denied 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991); City of Pompano Beach v. Yardarm Restaurant, Inc., 641 So.2d 1377, 1382, 1388 (Fl.Dist.Ct.
Cited (see also) · N.D. Fla. · signal: see also
See also Executive 100 v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536 , 1541 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991).
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ga. · signal: see also
See also Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County, 922 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 32 (1991).