Stouder Memorial Hospital v. Christopher (1991)
green
· 88 citation events
across 37 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Display Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Telegen Corp. (2001)
Fuller Co., 940 F.2d 631, 635 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1013 , 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991) (“[L]ater events may not create jurisdiction where none existed at the time of filing.”).
“[L]ater events may not create jurisdiction where none existed at the time of filing.”
green
McMenemy v. City of Rochester (2001)
See Johnson v. Palma, 931 F.2d 203, 208 (2d Cir.1991) (allowing retaliation claim where the plaintiff alleged that his union retaliated against him by refusing to prosecute his grievance because the plaintiff had filed an administrative charge of racial discrimination against his employer); see also Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hosp., 936 F.2d 870, 873-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1013 , 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991) (reporting trial court’s finding that…
reporting trial court’s finding that defendant’s frequent reference to plaintiffs sex discrimination action against prior employer warranted inference that defendant’s refusal to hire was retaliatory
green
Carparts v. Automotive (1994)
See also Christopher v. ______ ________ ___________ Stouder Memorial Hospital, 936 F.2d 870, 875 (6th Cir. 1991), __________________________ cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 658 (U.S. 1991) (interpreting Title VII, _____ ______ court stated that "a plaintiff is protected if the defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities") (internal quotations and citations omitted); Doe on behalf of Doe v. St.
interpreting Title VII, _____ ______ court stated that "a plaintiff is protected if the defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities"
green
Carparts v. Automotive (1994)
See also Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hospital, 936 F.2d 870, 875 (6th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 658 (U.S. 1991) (interpreting Title VII, court stated that "a plaintiff is protected if the defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities") (internal quotations and citations omitted); Doe on behalf of Doe v. St.
interpreting Title VII, court stated that "a plaintiff is protected if the defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities"
green
Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England, Inc. (1994)
See also Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hospital, 936 F.2d 870, 875 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991) (interpreting Title VII, court stated that “a plaintiff is protected if the'defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities”) (internal quotations and citations omitted); Doe on Behalf of Doe v. St.
interpreting Title VII, court stated that “a plaintiff is protected if the'defendant is one who significantly affects access of any individual to employment opportunities”
green
Charlton v. Paramus Board of Education (1994)
Inc., 814 F.Supp. 251, 260-61 (N.D.N.Y.1993) (ADEA); Berry v. Stevinson Chevrolet, 804 F.Supp. 121, 135-36 (D.Colo.1992) (Title VII); cf. EEOC v. Ohio Edison Co., 7 F.3d 541, 544-45 (6th Cir.1993); see also Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hosp., 936 F.2d 870, 875-77 (6th Cir.) (focusing on ability to “affect” employment opportunities in analyzing Title VII section 704 retaliation claim), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991).
green
Charlton v. Paramus Board of Education (1994)
Inc., 814 F.Supp. 251, 260-61 (N.D.N.Y.1993) (ADEA); Berry v. Stevinson Chevrolet, 804 F.Supp. 121, 135-36 (D.Colo.1992) (Title VII); cf. EEOC v. Ohio Edison Co., 7 F.3d 541, 544-45 (6th Cir.1993); see also Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hosp., 936 F.2d 870, 875-77 (6th Cir.) (focusing on ability to "affect" employment opportunities in analyzing Title VII section 704 retaliation claim), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991). 23 Using a narrow, …
green
Rennels v. NME Hospitals, Inc. (1998)
Contractors Inc., 847 F.Supp. 514, 519 (E.D.Tex.1994) (adopting Sibley rationale); see also Christopher v. Stouder Mem'l Hosp., 936 F.2d 870, 875 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1013 , 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 749 (1991); Zaklama v. Mt.
green
State of W.Va. ex rel. Biafore v. Earl Ray Tomblin (2016)
See also Trinsey v. Pennsylvania, 941 F.2d 224 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1014 , 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 750 (1991) (upholding Pennsylvania statute that did not require primaty election before general election to fill vacancy in United States Senate); Lynch v. Illinois State Bd. of Elections, 682 F.2d 93 , 97 (7th Cir.1982) (upholding Illinois election law providing for Mayor to fill aldermanic vacancy by appointment). .
upholding Pennsylvania statute that did not require primaty election before general election to fill vacancy in United States Senate
green
COMM. TO RECALL MENENDEZ v. Wells (2010)
See Trinsey v. Pennsylvania, 941 F. 2d 224, 228-29 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1014 , 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed. 2d 750 (1991).
green
Gietzen v. McMillon (1994)
See, e.g., Trinsey v. Com. of Pa., 941 F.2d 224 (3rd Cir.) (upholding Pennsylvania’s scheme in selecting nominees for Senatorial vacancies), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 750 (1991); Lynch v. Illinois State Bd. of Elections, 682 F.2d 93 (7th Cir.1982) (upholding Illinois municipal code allowing the filling of vacancies to elected municipal offices by appointment for period of up to 28 months plus 129 days before the next general election); see also Cin…
green
Karl Rove & Co. v. Thornburgh (1993)
See Trinsey v. Commonwealth of Pa., 941 F.2d 224 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 658 , 116 L.Ed.2d 750 (1991).