Huntsman v. United States (1992)
green
· 46 citation events
across 25 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Nancy Lynne Moyer (1999)
See United States v. Hood, 51 F.3d 128, 129 (8th Cir.1995), and United States v. Huntsman, 959 F.2d 1429, 1436-37 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 870 , 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Edüd 143 (1992).
green
Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., Appellee (1994)
See Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 681-82 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992).
green
St. Helen's Inv., Inc. v. Baardson (1994)
Co. v. Grace, 668 F.2d 1140 , 1147 (10th Cir.) ("arbitration awards generally need not delineate reasons or reasoning"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 838 (1982); accord Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 684 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 201 (1992); Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 750 (8th Cir.). cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 (1986).
See Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 685 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he Federal Arbitration Act allows arbitration to proceed with only a summary hearing and with restricted inquiry into factual issues”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992); Employers Ins. of Wausau, 933 F.2d at 1491 (fair hearing is based on notice, opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, and lack of biased decisionmaking); Sunshine Mining Co. v. United Steelworkers of Am., 823 F.2d 12…
See Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 684 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992); Raiford, 903 F.2d at 1412 . 4 .
See Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 685 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he Federal Arbitration Act allows arbitration to proceed with only a summary hearing and with restricted inquiry into factual issues”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 870 , 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992); Employers Ins. of Wausau, 933 F.2d at 1491 (fair hearing is based on notice, opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, and lack of biased decisionmaking); Sunshine Mining Co. v. United Steelworkers of Am., 823 F.…
green
Castleman v. AFC Enterprises, Inc. (1997)
See Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 683 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 870 , 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992).
See also, Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 682 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 870 , 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992).
Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Assocs., Inc., 857 F.2d 742, 749 (11th Cir.1988) (denying motion to vacate arbitration award on grounds of fraud because the moving party had the opportunity to cross-examine on the alleged false testimony); see also Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 684 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992) (arbitrators need not explain the reasons for their award).
arbitrators need not explain the reasons for their award
green
O'Rear v. AM. FAMILY LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF COLUMBUS (1993)
Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Assocs., Inc., 857 F.2d 742, 749 (11th Cir.1988) (denying motion to vacate arbitration award on grounds of fraud because the moving party had the opportunity to cross-examine on the alleged false testimony); see also Robbins v. Day, 954 F.2d 679, 684 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 201 , 121 L.Ed.2d 143 (1992) (arbitrators need not explain the reasons for their award).
arbitrators need not explain the reasons for their award