Martelli v. United States (1992)

See also United States v. Bauer, 956 F.2d 693, 695 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 (1992) (“Doubtless any defendant should be well warned of the dangers before he sets out to represent himself — whether by spuming proffered counsel or by refusing to dig into his pockets”).

See United States v. Belden, 957 F.2d 671, 676 (9th Cir.1992) (finding that district court did not believe departure was prevented as a matter of law where judge stated that he was “not inclined to depart” and that there was no basis for departure), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 234 , 121 L.Ed.2d 169 .

See also United States v. Belden, 957 F.2d 671, 676 (9th Cir.) (holding sentence not reviewable where district court stated that it was " 'not inclined to depart' and that, even though the sentence was harsh and [the court] sympathized with [defendant], 'there was no basis for departure' "), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 234 , 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992); United States v. Williams, 898 F.2d 1400, 1403 (9th Cir.1990) (holding sentence not reviewable where district court s…

See, e.g., United States v. Belden, 957 F.2d 671, 676 (9th Cir.) (rejecting minor participant reduction for defendant who argued that he was not directly involved in watering marijuana plants, but rather merely installed and maintained a generator), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 (1992).

See, e.g., United States v. Bauer, 956 F.2d 693 (7th Cir.) (failure to hire counsel where defendant has financial ability to do so constitutes a waiver by conduct), cert denied, [ 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 234 , 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992)]; United States v. Allen, 895 F.2d 1577 (10th Cir.1990) (district court properly treated defendant's dilatory conduct as a request to proceed pro se ).

See In re Anwiler, 115 B.R. 661, 664 (9th Cir. BAP 1990), aff'd, 958 F.2d 925 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 236 , 121 L.Ed.2d 171 (1992); see also In re Cortes, 125 B.R. 418, 421 (E.D.Pa.1991).

See, e.g., United States v. Bauer, 956 F.2d 693 , 695 (7th Cir.) ("the combination of ability to pay for counsel plus refusal to do so does waive the right to counsel" [emphasis in original] ), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 234 , 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992) ; see also Fischetti v. Johnson, 384 F.3d 140 , 145 (3d Cir.2004) ("[a] defendant's right to counsel is not without limit and cannot be the justification for inordinate delay or manipulation of the appointment system"…

See, e.g., United States v. Bauer, 956 F.2d 693, 695 (7th Cir.) (‘‘the combination of ability to pay for counsel plus refusal to do so does waive the right to counsel’’ [emphasis in original]), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S. Ct. 234 , 121 L.

See In re Anwiler, 115 B.R. 661, 664 (9th Cir. BAP 1990), aff’d, 958 F.2d 925 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S. Ct. 236 , 121 L.

See United States v. Torres, 959 F.2d 858, 860 (10th Cir.) (noting that denial of mistrial was proper where Government informant stated that he knew the defendant on the street as a drug dealer, because the trial court sustained the objection, struck the characterization from the record and instructed the jury to disregard it), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 236 , 121 L.Ed.2d 171 (1992); United States v. Rodriguez, 929 F.2d 1224, 1228 (7th Cir.1991) (District Court d…

See In re Anwiler, 958 F.2d 925, 929 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 113 S.Ct. 236 , 121 L.Ed.2d 171 (1992).