How cited: Miller v. Tucker · Go Syfert

Miller v. Tucker (1992)

green · 26 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Imran, 964 F.2d 1313, 1317 (2d Cir.) (defendant only entitled to legally correct charge, not any particular wording), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1009 , 113 S.Ct. 626 , 121 L.Ed.2d 558 (1992).
green United States v. Smith (2016)
Cited · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Vassell, 970 F.2d 1162, 1164 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1009 (1992) (“One commentator discerns a general consensus that a delay of over eight months meets this standard, while a delay of less than five months does not”, citing Gregory P.N.
“One commentator discerns a general consensus that a delay of over eight months meets this standard, while a delay of less than five months does not”, citing Gregory P.N. Joseph, Speedy Trial Rights in Application, 48 Fordham L.Rev. 611, 623 n. 71 (1980)
green State v. Duffy (2001)
Cited (see also) · N.H. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., State v. McCluskie, 611 A.2d 975, 977 (Me. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1009 (1992); State v. Aversa, 501 A.2d 370, 376 (Conn. 1985) (applying the preponderance of the evidence standard to determine if the waiver was voluntary and intelligent).
applying the preponderance of the evidence standard to determine if the waiver was voluntary and intelligent
green State v. King (1998)
Cited · Me. · signal: see
See State v. McCluskie, 611 A.2d 975, 977 (Me.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1009 , 113 S.Ct. 625 , 121 L.Ed.2d 558 (1992).
Cited · D.C. · signal: see
See Butler v. United States, 614 A.2d 875, 886-887 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1009 , 113 S.Ct. 625 , 121 L.Ed.2d 558 (1992) (instruction applicable only to aiders and abettors need not be given when evidence shows that defendant was a principal).
instruction applicable only to aiders and abettors need not be given when evidence shows that defendant was a principal