How cited: Arellano v. United States · Go Syfert

Arellano v. United States (1995)

green · 177 citation events across 19 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
green Bell v. Commonwealth (2002)
Quote Authority · Va. · signal: see
See United States v. Wellons, 32 F.3d 117, 119 (4th Cir. 1994) (unauthorized driver of rental car had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the vehicle), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 (1995); United States v. Hargrove, 647 F.2d 411, 413 (4th Cir. 1981) (“person who cannot assert a legitimate claim to a vehicle cannot reasonably expect that the vehicle is a private repository for his personal effects”).
“person who cannot assert a legitimate claim to a vehicle cannot reasonably expect that the vehicle is a private repository for his personal effects”
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Wellons, 32 F.3d 117 , 119 & n. 4 (4th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied,-U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); United States v. Roper, 918 F.2d 885, 887-88 (10th Cir.1990).
green Luis Vela v. State (2001)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State , 872 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Rezac v. State , 782 S.W.2d 869, 870 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990).
green Cardenas v. State (2000)
Cited · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 242-43 (Tex.Crim.App.1994) (appellant failed to prove deficient performance for failure to exercise peremptory challenge where venireperson expressed no predisposition toward the death penalty and indicated that she would be fair and open minded even though victim was a family friend), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995).
green Page v. State (1999)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 234 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Montoya v. State, 810 S.W.2d 160, 167 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 961 , 112 S.Ct. 426 , 116 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
green Rodriguez v. State (1998)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 245 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995) (holding that counsel need not object to admissible evidence to be effective). 7 2.
holding that counsel need not object to admissible evidence to be effective
green Butler v. Quarterman (2008)
Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995).
green Ortiz v. State (2002)
Cited · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 242 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995). .
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State , 872 S.W.2d 227, 245 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995) (holding that counsel need not object to admissible evidence to be effective).
holding that counsel need not object to admissible evidence to be effective
green Hughbank v. State (1998)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. *945 denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Rezac v. State, 782 S.W.2d 869, 870 (Tex.Crim.App.1990).
green Gibson v. State (1997)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Rezac v. State, 782 S.W.2d 869, 870 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). .
green Brownlee v. State (1997)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 236 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1157 , 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See id.
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Wellons, 32 F.3d 117, 119 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); United States v. Roper, 918 F.2d 885, 887-88 (10th Cir. 1990); United States v. Boruff, 909 F.2d 111, 117 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 975 , 111 S.Ct. 1620 , 113 L.Ed.2d 718 (1991).
green Jones v. State (1996)
Cited (see also) · Md. · signal: see also
See also Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 233 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995).
green Price v. State (1996)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227 (Tex.Cr.App.1994), cert. den’d, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Hernandez v. State, supra. Appellant’s Points of Error Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 7 through 12 are overruled.
green Chambers v. State (1995)
Cited (see also) · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Butler v. State, 872 S.W.2d 227, 236 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995) (objection at trial that confession was involuntary based on question of Miranda warnings did not comport with argument on appeal that confession was coerced); Camacho v. State, 864 S.W.2d 524 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1339 , 127 L.Ed.2d 687 (1994) (hearsay and relevancy trial objections did not preserve appellate…
objection at trial that confession was involuntary based on question of Miranda warnings did not comport with argument on appeal that confession was coerced
green Cluster 9008
Cited · signal: see
See United States v. Solomon, 29 F.3d 961, 965 (5th Cir.1994) (holding that district court’s instruction to jury to convict only for the specific offenses alleged in the indictment coupled with providing the jury with copies of the indictment “resulted in no uncertainty about whether the jury convicted Solomon of an offense not charged in the indictment”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1115 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1995); Holley, 23 F.3d at 912 (finding no constructive amendme…