Palomo v. Territory of Guam (1998)

See United States v. Williams, 139 F.3d 896 (4th Cir. 1998) (table), cert. denied 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 755 (1998).

See United States v. Brito, 136 F.3d 397 (5th Cir.) (holding that, where a juror stated in an affidavit that her verdict was “coerced” by other jurors and that the jurors impermissibly discussed punishment and appellate rights, the testimony was inadmissible on a motion for new trial absent anything to suggest that the coercion and information was brought to the jury’s attention by an outside source), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).

See United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407 (11th Cir.)(stating that a § 922 offense is a strict liability offense and a defendant’s state of mind is generally irrelevant), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).

See United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407 (11th Cir.)(stating that a §922 offense is a strict liability offense and a defendant’s state of mind is generally irrelevant), cert. 7 denied, 524 U.S. 962 (1998).

See, e.g., United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).

See, e.g., United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998); Rector, 111 F.3d at 505-07 ; United States v. Caron, 64 F.3d 713, 714-17 (1st Cir.1995), adhered to in relevant part on rehearing, 77 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1996); Etheridge, 932 F.2d at 320-22 (rejecting application of defense to § 922 where defendant claimed to rely on advice of state trial judge); United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 466…