Hass v. United States (2000)
green
· 12 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. McCoy (2002)
Ticchiarelli, 171 F.3d at 32-33 ; see also United States v. Hass, 199 F.3d 749, 753 (5th Cir.1999) (“[W]hether a defendant waived an issue for consideration at resen-tencing is determined by whether the defendant had an incentive to raise that issue in the prior proceedings.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 812 , 121 S.Ct. 34 , 148 L.Ed.2d 14 (2000).
green
United States v. McCoy, JoAnn (2002)
This approach requires a fact-intensive, case-by-case analysis. 62 Ticchiarelli, 171 F.3d at 32-33 ; see also United States v. Hass, 199 F.3d 749, 753 (5th Cir.1999) ("[W]hether a defendant waived an issue for consideration at resentencing is determined by whether the defendant had an incentive to raise that issue in the prior proceedings."), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 812 , 121 S.Ct. 34 , 148 L.Ed.2d 14 (2000).
green
Vickie Kansler v. Mississippi Department of Revenue (2018)
Ind. Aug. 20, 2001) ; see also American Target Advertising, Inc. v. Giani , 199 F.3d 1241 , 1254-55 (10th Cir.) (holding that because Quill and related cases "concern the levy of taxes upon out-of-state entities," they govern only the analysis of tax burdens) (emphasis in original), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S.Ct. 34 , 148 L.Ed.2d 14 (2000) ; Ferndale Lab., Inc. v. Cavendish , 79 F.3d 488 , 494 (6th Cir.1996) (holding that because "virtually every precedent relied up…
green
Xcaliber International Ltd. v. Ieyoub (2005)
Aug.20, 2001); see also American Target Advertising, Inc. v. Giani, 199 F.3d 1241, 1254-55 (10th Cir.) (holding that because Quill and related cases “concern the levy of taxes upon out-of-state entities,” they govern only the analysis of tax burdens) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 811 , 121 S.Ct. 34 , 148 L.Ed.2d 14 (2000); Ferndale Lab., Inc. v. Cavendish, 79 F.3d 488 , 494 (6th Cir.1996) (holding that because “virtually every precedent relied upon by the Co…
green
Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United States (2004)
Yet, individuals operating in highly regulated fields do not forfeit their rights under the Fifth Amendment to the whim of whatever regulation the winds may bring — “[t]he mere fact of regulation ... does not signify that an investor can never form a reasonable expectation of a return on his investment.” American Pelagic I, 49 Fed.Cl. at 49; see also District Intown Properties, L.P. v. District of Columbia, 198 F.3d 874, 886-87 (D.C.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 812 , 12…
Williams, J. concurring