How cited: Aheart v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. · Go Syfert

Aheart v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. (2000)

green · 41 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 538.
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also
See id. at 608 , 105 S.Ct. at 2860 ; see also Eastman Kodak, 504 U.S. at 483 , 112 S.Ct. at 2091 (exclusionary conduct properly is condemned if valid business reasons do not justify conduct that tends to impair the opportunities of a monopolist's rivals or if a valid asserted purpose would be served fully by less restrictive means). 195 On the other hand, in Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1043, 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 42
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: accord
“A mere scintilla of evidence is inadequate to support a verdict, and judgment as a matter of law is proper when the record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict.” Id. (citation omitted); accord Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1050 (8th Cir.) (“A motion for judgment as a matter of law should be granted if, when considering the evidence in this manner, ‘without weighing’ the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasona…
Cited (see also) · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see also
See also, Heirs of Guerra v. United States of America, 207 F. 3d 763, 767 (5th Cir.) (holding that "a declaration of taking creates only defeasible title"), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 , 148 L.Ed. 2d 436 (2000); 29A C.J.S.
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See United States Football League v. Nat’l Football League, 842 F.2d 1335 , 1377-79 (2d Cir.1988) (plaintiffs must demonstrate that defendants’ unlawful acts, and not other factors, substantially contributed to their injuries); Intimate Bookshop, 2003 WL 22251312 , at *4-7 (granting summary judgment where plaintiff “provided no evidence, in any form, that defendants’ alleged violation of the Act, as opposed to other intervening market factors, was a material cause of its los…
expert opinion insufficient to sustain damages claim where it did not distinguish lawful from unlawful conduct
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Commander Oil Corp. v. Barlo Equipment Corp., 215 F.3d 321, 326 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S. Ct. 427 , 148 L.
Cited (see also) · M.D.N.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1059 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 , 148 L.Ed.2d 436 (2000) (applying substantial foreclosure test to manufacturer’s discount programs tied to volume purchases); Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp., 724 F.2d 227, 236-37 (1st Cir.1983) (applying substantial foreclosure test to partial requirements contract).
applying substantial foreclosure test to manufacturer’s discount programs tied to volume purchases