Rodriguez de Varon v. United States (1999)

See id. ("[I]f [the defendant's] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, . . . a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant's role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor."); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) ( en banc ) ("[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attri…

See United States v. De Varon, 175 F.3d 930 , 937 & n.3 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (“This Court has long and repeatedly held that a district court’s determination of a defendant’s role in the offense is a finding of fact to be reviewed only for clear error.”), cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 120 S. Ct. 424 , 145 L.

See id. (“[I]f [the defendant’s] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, ... a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant’s role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor.”); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the d…

See id. (“[I]f [the defendant’s] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, ... a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant’s role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor.”); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (“[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attribute…

See United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 943-44 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 331 (1999) (“[I]n determining a defendant’s role in the offense, a district court must measure the defendant’s role against the relevant conduct attributed to her in calculating her base offense level....

See United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941-44 (11th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 331 (1999); United States v. James, 157 F.3d 1218, 1220 (10th Cir.1998); United States v. Marmolejo, 106 F.3d 1213, 1217 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Lewis, 93 F.3d 1075, 1085 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Olibrices, 979 F.2d 1557, 1560-61 (D.C.Cir.1992).

See id. ("[I]f [the defendant's] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, . . . a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant's role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor."); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) ("[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the…

See United States v. Rodriguez de Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941-44 (11th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. denied 120 S. Ct. 424 (1999) (No. 99-6150); United States v. James, 157 F.3d 1218, 1220 (10th Cir. 1998); United States v. Marmolejo, 106 F.3d 1213, 1217 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Lewis, 93 F.3d 1075, 1085 (2d Cir. 1996); United States v. Olibrices, 979 F.2d 1557 , 1560- 61 (D.C.

See United States v. True, 179 F.3d 1087, 1088-89 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 332 (1999).

See United States v. True, No. 98-3824, 1999 WL 604202 , at *2 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 424 (1999).

See United States v. De Varon, 175 F.3d 930 , 937 & n. 3 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (“This Court has long and repeatedly held that a district court’s determination of a defendant’s role in the offense is a finding of fact to be reviewed only for clear error.”), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 976 , 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 331 (1999).

See, True v. United States, 528 U.S. 976 , 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 332 (1999).

See, e.g., Anderson v. General Motors Corp., 176 F.3d 488 , 1999 WL 240242 , at *2 (10th Cir. Apr. 20, 1999) (Table), petition for cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , — L.Ed.2d - (1999); Bolton, 36 F.3d at 944 .