Redman v. United States (2001)
green
· 80 citation events
across 24 courts.
Showing the 17 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapia (2002)
Jones was a § 2254 petition so it did not decide the issue addressed in the previous paragraph. 14 Id. at 1232. 15 Id. at 1236. 16 Id. at 1238 (holding that, regarding Teague's second exception, "the omission of particular key words from the written information neither increases the risk that an innocent person will be convicted nor hinders the fundamental fairness of the trial"). 17 Teague, 489 U.S. at 307 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 . 18 See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 14…
"The first exception clearly does not apply here because Apprendi did not place drug conspiracies beyond the scope of the state's authority to proscribe."
green
Saylor v. State (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.) cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) ("neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have held that Apprendi is retroactively applicable on collateral attack.") Several district courts have held that Apprendi does apply to habeas corpus petitions.
"neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have held that Apprendi is retroactively applicable on collateral attack."
green
Lyons v. Lee (2003)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 573 (2001); see also Hartman v. Lee, 283 F.3d 190 , 192 n.2 (4th Cir. 2002).
green
United States v. Ringer (2005)
See United States v. Ringer, 9 Fed.Appx. 844 (10th Cir.2001) (unpublished), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
Elda San Juanita Regalado v. United States (2003)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1097 , 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir.2000); McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002). 8 .
green
United States v. Smith (2003)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
Robbie James Lyons v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Robbie James Lyons v. R.C. L… (2003)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Hartman v. Lee, 283 F.3d 190 , 192 n. 2 (4th Cir.2002).
green
United States v. Cross (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
United States v. Manigault (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
United States v. Collins (2002)
CR-91-312; CA-01-2729-1-22 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 17, 2001; entered Oct. 18, 2001); see also United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. , 122 S. Ct. 573 (2001) (holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review).
holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review
green
United States v. Collins (2002)
CR-91-312; CA-01-2729-1-22 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 17, 2001; entered Oct. 18, 2001); see also United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) (holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review).
holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review
green
United States v. Sifuentes (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.) (concluding Apprendi did not apply retroactively to collateral review of initial § 2255 motion), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Browning v. United States, 241 F.3d 1262, 1266 (10th Cir.2001) (en banc) (concluding Apprendi does not apply to second or successive habeas petitions, absent express direction from the Supreme Court); Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227, 1238 (9th Cir.2000)…
green
United States v. Staton (2001)
Mar. 2, 2001); see United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.2001) (holding that rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , — L.Ed.2d - (2001).
green
Strickland v. Lee (2007)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 357 , 124 S.Ct. 2519, 2526 , 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004) (“Ring [v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 , 122 S.Ct. 2428 , 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) ] announced a new procedural rule that does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review.”).
green
Lyons v. Lee (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
United States v. Bridges (2002)
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.) (concluding Apprendi did not apply retroactively to collateral review of initial § 2255 motion), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
green
State v. Davlin (2002)
See, State v. Redmond, 262 Neb. 411 , 631 N.W.2d 501 (2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1033 , 122 S. Ct. 573 , 151 L.